Why doesn't the escape of electromagnetic waves from a microwave depend on the reference frame, because of...












14














If an observer traveling towards a microwave oven at almost the speed of light blue shifts the microwaves enough to be visible light, how can the mesh on the oven door still stop to waves from escaping the oven?



And conversely, if an observer traveling at almost the speed of light away from a microwave oven red shifts the visible light enough to be microwaves, how can the mesh on the oven door still allow the waves to escape the oven?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
    – Solomon Slow
    Dec 21 at 20:56










  • @SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
    – b.Lorenz
    Dec 21 at 20:56












  • It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
    – StudyStudy
    Dec 21 at 20:58










  • That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
    – my2cts
    Dec 21 at 21:08










  • "Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
    – Maury Markowitz
    Dec 21 at 21:10
















14














If an observer traveling towards a microwave oven at almost the speed of light blue shifts the microwaves enough to be visible light, how can the mesh on the oven door still stop to waves from escaping the oven?



And conversely, if an observer traveling at almost the speed of light away from a microwave oven red shifts the visible light enough to be microwaves, how can the mesh on the oven door still allow the waves to escape the oven?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
    – Solomon Slow
    Dec 21 at 20:56










  • @SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
    – b.Lorenz
    Dec 21 at 20:56












  • It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
    – StudyStudy
    Dec 21 at 20:58










  • That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
    – my2cts
    Dec 21 at 21:08










  • "Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
    – Maury Markowitz
    Dec 21 at 21:10














14












14








14


3





If an observer traveling towards a microwave oven at almost the speed of light blue shifts the microwaves enough to be visible light, how can the mesh on the oven door still stop to waves from escaping the oven?



And conversely, if an observer traveling at almost the speed of light away from a microwave oven red shifts the visible light enough to be microwaves, how can the mesh on the oven door still allow the waves to escape the oven?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











If an observer traveling towards a microwave oven at almost the speed of light blue shifts the microwaves enough to be visible light, how can the mesh on the oven door still stop to waves from escaping the oven?



And conversely, if an observer traveling at almost the speed of light away from a microwave oven red shifts the visible light enough to be microwaves, how can the mesh on the oven door still allow the waves to escape the oven?







electromagnetism special-relativity microwaves redshift






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 at 12:47









knzhou

41.5k11117199




41.5k11117199






New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 21 at 20:49









samwa

714




714




New contributor




samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






samwa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 7




    The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
    – Solomon Slow
    Dec 21 at 20:56










  • @SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
    – b.Lorenz
    Dec 21 at 20:56












  • It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
    – StudyStudy
    Dec 21 at 20:58










  • That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
    – my2cts
    Dec 21 at 21:08










  • "Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
    – Maury Markowitz
    Dec 21 at 21:10














  • 7




    The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
    – Solomon Slow
    Dec 21 at 20:56










  • @SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
    – b.Lorenz
    Dec 21 at 20:56












  • It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
    – StudyStudy
    Dec 21 at 20:58










  • That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
    – my2cts
    Dec 21 at 21:08










  • "Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
    – Maury Markowitz
    Dec 21 at 21:10








7




7




The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
– Solomon Slow
Dec 21 at 20:56




The screen moves with the oven. From it's point of view, the radiation is in the microwave region, and it won't let any out. It would be different if you could jury rig the oven to operate with the door removed, and then you carried the door with you while you did the experiment. In that case, the screen's point of view would be the same as your point of view. It would see blue light, and it would let the blue light through the holes.
– Solomon Slow
Dec 21 at 20:56












@SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
– b.Lorenz
Dec 21 at 20:56






@SolomonSlow What you are saying is right, but there is more in this question. Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not), regardless of the frame of reference we are using. I hope that StudyStudy or someone else more well-versed in relativistic electrodynamics than me would write an answer.
– b.Lorenz
Dec 21 at 20:56














It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
– StudyStudy
Dec 21 at 20:58




It's going to come back to the Faraday tensor....en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
– StudyStudy
Dec 21 at 20:58












That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
– my2cts
Dec 21 at 21:08




That does not answer the question. It is clear that the light will not come out from the start.
– my2cts
Dec 21 at 21:08












"Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
– Maury Markowitz
Dec 21 at 21:10




"Per relativity, the same thing has to happen (either we can detect photons by a fixed detector in front of the owen or not" - sure, and the answer in this case is "not" in all frames of reference. You will not see microwaves getting out when standing in front of it, when flying towards it, or with a goat, or on a boat. Where is the mystery.
– Maury Markowitz
Dec 21 at 21:10










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















7














First of all, let's get a better picture of why microwave doors keep waves inside the oven in the first place. Using a generous amount of hand-waving: imagine that an electromagnetic wave is incident on a circular hole in the microwave oven door. Furthermore imagine that at some moment in time, the electric field is pointed towards the right side of the hole. Then electrons will move towards the left side, creating a new wave in the electric field. However, it takes some time for the wave to travel all the way around the edge of the hole. If the distance around the hole is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the incident wave [1], then the new wave is exactly out of phase with the incident wave. Thus, outside of the box, the incident wave gets canceled out.



All right, how does this look in the fast-moving observer's frame of reference? Well, the incident and response waves are propagating in the same direction, so the Doppler effect is exactly the same for both. [2] Therefore, they still cancel each other out in the observer's frame.



Notes:




  1. If the hole circumference is smaller than the wavelength, there is still a path inside the metal with the same length as the incident wavelength, so the same thing happens. Waves created along paths longer and shorter than the wavelength cancel each other out. A small amount of the incident wave gets through because this cancellation process doesn't work perfectly for nonzero hole sizes. Getting a more detailed picture of the interaction would require a full numerical simulation, but this model is accurate enough for the question.


  2. We can be a bit more precise about why the Doppler effect is the same for both the incident and response waves. The relativistic Doppler effect has two components: time dilation, which shows up as $gamma$, and the ordinary Doppler effect (due to the finite speed of light and the distance between wavefronts), which appears as $1-beta$. From the observer's perspective, the ordinary Doppler component is the same for both the incident and response waves, while time dilation shows up as the electrons in the door appearing to respond much more quickly than they do in the microwave oven frame.







share|cite|improve this answer





























    4














    The moving glass door has a different response to the electromagnetic field. You have to transform its electromagnetic susceptibility along. This is a forth rank Lorentz tensor say $epsilon_{munurhosigma} $ containing the dielectric and the magnetic susceptibility. It has the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor of GR. The result will be that the window is opaque. I leave it to to work this out as an interesting exercise.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
      – Wolphram jonny
      Dec 21 at 21:44












    • The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
      – my2cts
      Dec 21 at 22:36












    • oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
      – Wolphram jonny
      Dec 22 at 0:36



















    0














    There's a very simple intuition here: the microwaves bounce off because they're wider than the holes. In the moving frame, the microwaves are only contracted lengthwise. They're still just as wide, so they still bounce off.



    If you used a frame where the microwave was moving sideways, the width of the microwaves would indeed be contracted. But then the holes would be too, by the same factor, so they still don't get out.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
      – knzhou
      Dec 22 at 14:09










    • Well, that makes sense.
      – b.Lorenz
      Dec 22 at 14:25



















    0














    The answer is the wave is not actually changing. Think of it this way. When a car playing loud music drives by, the pitch increases as it approaches, sounds correct for a moment, then the pitch decreases as it moves away. The person in the car hears the same pitch the whole time.



    Edit:



    Additionally, imagine a car is driving 40 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. The collision will occur with results consistent with a 40 mph collision. Now if a car is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph toward it (head on), a collision will occur with results consistent with a car driving 80 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. If a car which is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph from behind (rear end), a collision will not even occur...so let us imagine the car in the rear is driving 41 mph...a collision will occur which is consistent with a car driving 1 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph.



    In other words:



    The music which has exited the car through the window and has been heard by someone standing outside the car, is the sound which is experienced as being different.



    The music is a higher pitch while the car is moving toward the person because the speed* of the wave is increased by the speed of the car. The pitch sounds normal for a moment because the car is not moving toward or away from the person which leaves the speed* of the sound as it is, and the pitch is lower as the car is moving away because the speed* of the sound wave is reduced by the speed of the car.



    Application to the microwave scenario:



    The microwave oven is like the car and the electromagnetic wave (visible or microwave) is like the sound wave of the music.



    The electromagnetic wave being shifted is the one which has left the interior of the microwave oven.



    The shift being observed in the electromagnetic wave is caused by a change in the speed* of the wave as it is observed relative to the observer.



    Edit: *speed of the waves therefore increased frequency.






    share|cite|improve this answer































      0














      Doppler affects the observers perception. The observed does not change, so the microwaves would still be blocked and, you could not see them at all, let alone them shifted.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        samwa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449742%2fwhy-doesnt-the-escape-of-electromagnetic-waves-from-a-microwave-depend-on-the-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7














        First of all, let's get a better picture of why microwave doors keep waves inside the oven in the first place. Using a generous amount of hand-waving: imagine that an electromagnetic wave is incident on a circular hole in the microwave oven door. Furthermore imagine that at some moment in time, the electric field is pointed towards the right side of the hole. Then electrons will move towards the left side, creating a new wave in the electric field. However, it takes some time for the wave to travel all the way around the edge of the hole. If the distance around the hole is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the incident wave [1], then the new wave is exactly out of phase with the incident wave. Thus, outside of the box, the incident wave gets canceled out.



        All right, how does this look in the fast-moving observer's frame of reference? Well, the incident and response waves are propagating in the same direction, so the Doppler effect is exactly the same for both. [2] Therefore, they still cancel each other out in the observer's frame.



        Notes:




        1. If the hole circumference is smaller than the wavelength, there is still a path inside the metal with the same length as the incident wavelength, so the same thing happens. Waves created along paths longer and shorter than the wavelength cancel each other out. A small amount of the incident wave gets through because this cancellation process doesn't work perfectly for nonzero hole sizes. Getting a more detailed picture of the interaction would require a full numerical simulation, but this model is accurate enough for the question.


        2. We can be a bit more precise about why the Doppler effect is the same for both the incident and response waves. The relativistic Doppler effect has two components: time dilation, which shows up as $gamma$, and the ordinary Doppler effect (due to the finite speed of light and the distance between wavefronts), which appears as $1-beta$. From the observer's perspective, the ordinary Doppler component is the same for both the incident and response waves, while time dilation shows up as the electrons in the door appearing to respond much more quickly than they do in the microwave oven frame.







        share|cite|improve this answer


























          7














          First of all, let's get a better picture of why microwave doors keep waves inside the oven in the first place. Using a generous amount of hand-waving: imagine that an electromagnetic wave is incident on a circular hole in the microwave oven door. Furthermore imagine that at some moment in time, the electric field is pointed towards the right side of the hole. Then electrons will move towards the left side, creating a new wave in the electric field. However, it takes some time for the wave to travel all the way around the edge of the hole. If the distance around the hole is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the incident wave [1], then the new wave is exactly out of phase with the incident wave. Thus, outside of the box, the incident wave gets canceled out.



          All right, how does this look in the fast-moving observer's frame of reference? Well, the incident and response waves are propagating in the same direction, so the Doppler effect is exactly the same for both. [2] Therefore, they still cancel each other out in the observer's frame.



          Notes:




          1. If the hole circumference is smaller than the wavelength, there is still a path inside the metal with the same length as the incident wavelength, so the same thing happens. Waves created along paths longer and shorter than the wavelength cancel each other out. A small amount of the incident wave gets through because this cancellation process doesn't work perfectly for nonzero hole sizes. Getting a more detailed picture of the interaction would require a full numerical simulation, but this model is accurate enough for the question.


          2. We can be a bit more precise about why the Doppler effect is the same for both the incident and response waves. The relativistic Doppler effect has two components: time dilation, which shows up as $gamma$, and the ordinary Doppler effect (due to the finite speed of light and the distance between wavefronts), which appears as $1-beta$. From the observer's perspective, the ordinary Doppler component is the same for both the incident and response waves, while time dilation shows up as the electrons in the door appearing to respond much more quickly than they do in the microwave oven frame.







          share|cite|improve this answer
























            7












            7








            7






            First of all, let's get a better picture of why microwave doors keep waves inside the oven in the first place. Using a generous amount of hand-waving: imagine that an electromagnetic wave is incident on a circular hole in the microwave oven door. Furthermore imagine that at some moment in time, the electric field is pointed towards the right side of the hole. Then electrons will move towards the left side, creating a new wave in the electric field. However, it takes some time for the wave to travel all the way around the edge of the hole. If the distance around the hole is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the incident wave [1], then the new wave is exactly out of phase with the incident wave. Thus, outside of the box, the incident wave gets canceled out.



            All right, how does this look in the fast-moving observer's frame of reference? Well, the incident and response waves are propagating in the same direction, so the Doppler effect is exactly the same for both. [2] Therefore, they still cancel each other out in the observer's frame.



            Notes:




            1. If the hole circumference is smaller than the wavelength, there is still a path inside the metal with the same length as the incident wavelength, so the same thing happens. Waves created along paths longer and shorter than the wavelength cancel each other out. A small amount of the incident wave gets through because this cancellation process doesn't work perfectly for nonzero hole sizes. Getting a more detailed picture of the interaction would require a full numerical simulation, but this model is accurate enough for the question.


            2. We can be a bit more precise about why the Doppler effect is the same for both the incident and response waves. The relativistic Doppler effect has two components: time dilation, which shows up as $gamma$, and the ordinary Doppler effect (due to the finite speed of light and the distance between wavefronts), which appears as $1-beta$. From the observer's perspective, the ordinary Doppler component is the same for both the incident and response waves, while time dilation shows up as the electrons in the door appearing to respond much more quickly than they do in the microwave oven frame.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            First of all, let's get a better picture of why microwave doors keep waves inside the oven in the first place. Using a generous amount of hand-waving: imagine that an electromagnetic wave is incident on a circular hole in the microwave oven door. Furthermore imagine that at some moment in time, the electric field is pointed towards the right side of the hole. Then electrons will move towards the left side, creating a new wave in the electric field. However, it takes some time for the wave to travel all the way around the edge of the hole. If the distance around the hole is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the incident wave [1], then the new wave is exactly out of phase with the incident wave. Thus, outside of the box, the incident wave gets canceled out.



            All right, how does this look in the fast-moving observer's frame of reference? Well, the incident and response waves are propagating in the same direction, so the Doppler effect is exactly the same for both. [2] Therefore, they still cancel each other out in the observer's frame.



            Notes:




            1. If the hole circumference is smaller than the wavelength, there is still a path inside the metal with the same length as the incident wavelength, so the same thing happens. Waves created along paths longer and shorter than the wavelength cancel each other out. A small amount of the incident wave gets through because this cancellation process doesn't work perfectly for nonzero hole sizes. Getting a more detailed picture of the interaction would require a full numerical simulation, but this model is accurate enough for the question.


            2. We can be a bit more precise about why the Doppler effect is the same for both the incident and response waves. The relativistic Doppler effect has two components: time dilation, which shows up as $gamma$, and the ordinary Doppler effect (due to the finite speed of light and the distance between wavefronts), which appears as $1-beta$. From the observer's perspective, the ordinary Doppler component is the same for both the incident and response waves, while time dilation shows up as the electrons in the door appearing to respond much more quickly than they do in the microwave oven frame.








            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 21 at 22:21









            Thorondor

            1,07720




            1,07720























                4














                The moving glass door has a different response to the electromagnetic field. You have to transform its electromagnetic susceptibility along. This is a forth rank Lorentz tensor say $epsilon_{munurhosigma} $ containing the dielectric and the magnetic susceptibility. It has the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor of GR. The result will be that the window is opaque. I leave it to to work this out as an interesting exercise.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 21 at 21:44












                • The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                  – my2cts
                  Dec 21 at 22:36












                • oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 22 at 0:36
















                4














                The moving glass door has a different response to the electromagnetic field. You have to transform its electromagnetic susceptibility along. This is a forth rank Lorentz tensor say $epsilon_{munurhosigma} $ containing the dielectric and the magnetic susceptibility. It has the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor of GR. The result will be that the window is opaque. I leave it to to work this out as an interesting exercise.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 21 at 21:44












                • The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                  – my2cts
                  Dec 21 at 22:36












                • oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 22 at 0:36














                4












                4








                4






                The moving glass door has a different response to the electromagnetic field. You have to transform its electromagnetic susceptibility along. This is a forth rank Lorentz tensor say $epsilon_{munurhosigma} $ containing the dielectric and the magnetic susceptibility. It has the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor of GR. The result will be that the window is opaque. I leave it to to work this out as an interesting exercise.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                The moving glass door has a different response to the electromagnetic field. You have to transform its electromagnetic susceptibility along. This is a forth rank Lorentz tensor say $epsilon_{munurhosigma} $ containing the dielectric and the magnetic susceptibility. It has the same symmetry as the Riemann tensor of GR. The result will be that the window is opaque. I leave it to to work this out as an interesting exercise.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 22 at 0:36









                Wolphram jonny

                10.8k22553




                10.8k22553










                answered Dec 21 at 21:36









                my2cts

                4,4582617




                4,4582617












                • where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 21 at 21:44












                • The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                  – my2cts
                  Dec 21 at 22:36












                • oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 22 at 0:36


















                • where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 21 at 21:44












                • The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                  – my2cts
                  Dec 21 at 22:36












                • oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                  – Wolphram jonny
                  Dec 22 at 0:36
















                where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                – Wolphram jonny
                Dec 21 at 21:44






                where does the electromag. suceptibility enter into play? it is about the size of the holes only, that make the metal act like a faraday cage, right?
                – Wolphram jonny
                Dec 21 at 21:44














                The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                – my2cts
                Dec 21 at 22:36






                The susceptibility of the metal must be transformed. I predict that the oven acts as a Faraday cage at the frequency of the radiation in any reference frame.
                – my2cts
                Dec 21 at 22:36














                oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                – Wolphram jonny
                Dec 22 at 0:36




                oh I see! you seem correct, although I have no idea, lol
                – Wolphram jonny
                Dec 22 at 0:36











                0














                There's a very simple intuition here: the microwaves bounce off because they're wider than the holes. In the moving frame, the microwaves are only contracted lengthwise. They're still just as wide, so they still bounce off.



                If you used a frame where the microwave was moving sideways, the width of the microwaves would indeed be contracted. But then the holes would be too, by the same factor, so they still don't get out.






                share|cite|improve this answer





















                • @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                  – knzhou
                  Dec 22 at 14:09










                • Well, that makes sense.
                  – b.Lorenz
                  Dec 22 at 14:25
















                0














                There's a very simple intuition here: the microwaves bounce off because they're wider than the holes. In the moving frame, the microwaves are only contracted lengthwise. They're still just as wide, so they still bounce off.



                If you used a frame where the microwave was moving sideways, the width of the microwaves would indeed be contracted. But then the holes would be too, by the same factor, so they still don't get out.






                share|cite|improve this answer





















                • @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                  – knzhou
                  Dec 22 at 14:09










                • Well, that makes sense.
                  – b.Lorenz
                  Dec 22 at 14:25














                0












                0








                0






                There's a very simple intuition here: the microwaves bounce off because they're wider than the holes. In the moving frame, the microwaves are only contracted lengthwise. They're still just as wide, so they still bounce off.



                If you used a frame where the microwave was moving sideways, the width of the microwaves would indeed be contracted. But then the holes would be too, by the same factor, so they still don't get out.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                There's a very simple intuition here: the microwaves bounce off because they're wider than the holes. In the moving frame, the microwaves are only contracted lengthwise. They're still just as wide, so they still bounce off.



                If you used a frame where the microwave was moving sideways, the width of the microwaves would indeed be contracted. But then the holes would be too, by the same factor, so they still don't get out.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 22 at 12:46









                knzhou

                41.5k11117199




                41.5k11117199












                • @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                  – knzhou
                  Dec 22 at 14:09










                • Well, that makes sense.
                  – b.Lorenz
                  Dec 22 at 14:25


















                • @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                  – knzhou
                  Dec 22 at 14:09










                • Well, that makes sense.
                  – b.Lorenz
                  Dec 22 at 14:25
















                @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                – knzhou
                Dec 22 at 14:09




                @b.Lorenz If you think about it a bit more, you'll realize that while it sounds superficially like a wrong explanation, it's actually right. If you make a wavepacket whose width is less wide than a hole, it will sail right through. There isn't some magical nonlocal effect that makes it bounce off.
                – knzhou
                Dec 22 at 14:09












                Well, that makes sense.
                – b.Lorenz
                Dec 22 at 14:25




                Well, that makes sense.
                – b.Lorenz
                Dec 22 at 14:25











                0














                The answer is the wave is not actually changing. Think of it this way. When a car playing loud music drives by, the pitch increases as it approaches, sounds correct for a moment, then the pitch decreases as it moves away. The person in the car hears the same pitch the whole time.



                Edit:



                Additionally, imagine a car is driving 40 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. The collision will occur with results consistent with a 40 mph collision. Now if a car is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph toward it (head on), a collision will occur with results consistent with a car driving 80 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. If a car which is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph from behind (rear end), a collision will not even occur...so let us imagine the car in the rear is driving 41 mph...a collision will occur which is consistent with a car driving 1 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph.



                In other words:



                The music which has exited the car through the window and has been heard by someone standing outside the car, is the sound which is experienced as being different.



                The music is a higher pitch while the car is moving toward the person because the speed* of the wave is increased by the speed of the car. The pitch sounds normal for a moment because the car is not moving toward or away from the person which leaves the speed* of the sound as it is, and the pitch is lower as the car is moving away because the speed* of the sound wave is reduced by the speed of the car.



                Application to the microwave scenario:



                The microwave oven is like the car and the electromagnetic wave (visible or microwave) is like the sound wave of the music.



                The electromagnetic wave being shifted is the one which has left the interior of the microwave oven.



                The shift being observed in the electromagnetic wave is caused by a change in the speed* of the wave as it is observed relative to the observer.



                Edit: *speed of the waves therefore increased frequency.






                share|cite|improve this answer




























                  0














                  The answer is the wave is not actually changing. Think of it this way. When a car playing loud music drives by, the pitch increases as it approaches, sounds correct for a moment, then the pitch decreases as it moves away. The person in the car hears the same pitch the whole time.



                  Edit:



                  Additionally, imagine a car is driving 40 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. The collision will occur with results consistent with a 40 mph collision. Now if a car is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph toward it (head on), a collision will occur with results consistent with a car driving 80 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. If a car which is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph from behind (rear end), a collision will not even occur...so let us imagine the car in the rear is driving 41 mph...a collision will occur which is consistent with a car driving 1 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph.



                  In other words:



                  The music which has exited the car through the window and has been heard by someone standing outside the car, is the sound which is experienced as being different.



                  The music is a higher pitch while the car is moving toward the person because the speed* of the wave is increased by the speed of the car. The pitch sounds normal for a moment because the car is not moving toward or away from the person which leaves the speed* of the sound as it is, and the pitch is lower as the car is moving away because the speed* of the sound wave is reduced by the speed of the car.



                  Application to the microwave scenario:



                  The microwave oven is like the car and the electromagnetic wave (visible or microwave) is like the sound wave of the music.



                  The electromagnetic wave being shifted is the one which has left the interior of the microwave oven.



                  The shift being observed in the electromagnetic wave is caused by a change in the speed* of the wave as it is observed relative to the observer.



                  Edit: *speed of the waves therefore increased frequency.






                  share|cite|improve this answer


























                    0












                    0








                    0






                    The answer is the wave is not actually changing. Think of it this way. When a car playing loud music drives by, the pitch increases as it approaches, sounds correct for a moment, then the pitch decreases as it moves away. The person in the car hears the same pitch the whole time.



                    Edit:



                    Additionally, imagine a car is driving 40 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. The collision will occur with results consistent with a 40 mph collision. Now if a car is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph toward it (head on), a collision will occur with results consistent with a car driving 80 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. If a car which is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph from behind (rear end), a collision will not even occur...so let us imagine the car in the rear is driving 41 mph...a collision will occur which is consistent with a car driving 1 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph.



                    In other words:



                    The music which has exited the car through the window and has been heard by someone standing outside the car, is the sound which is experienced as being different.



                    The music is a higher pitch while the car is moving toward the person because the speed* of the wave is increased by the speed of the car. The pitch sounds normal for a moment because the car is not moving toward or away from the person which leaves the speed* of the sound as it is, and the pitch is lower as the car is moving away because the speed* of the sound wave is reduced by the speed of the car.



                    Application to the microwave scenario:



                    The microwave oven is like the car and the electromagnetic wave (visible or microwave) is like the sound wave of the music.



                    The electromagnetic wave being shifted is the one which has left the interior of the microwave oven.



                    The shift being observed in the electromagnetic wave is caused by a change in the speed* of the wave as it is observed relative to the observer.



                    Edit: *speed of the waves therefore increased frequency.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    The answer is the wave is not actually changing. Think of it this way. When a car playing loud music drives by, the pitch increases as it approaches, sounds correct for a moment, then the pitch decreases as it moves away. The person in the car hears the same pitch the whole time.



                    Edit:



                    Additionally, imagine a car is driving 40 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. The collision will occur with results consistent with a 40 mph collision. Now if a car is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph toward it (head on), a collision will occur with results consistent with a car driving 80 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph. If a car which is driving 40 mph toward another car which is driving 40 mph from behind (rear end), a collision will not even occur...so let us imagine the car in the rear is driving 41 mph...a collision will occur which is consistent with a car driving 1 mph toward a wall which is moving 0 mph.



                    In other words:



                    The music which has exited the car through the window and has been heard by someone standing outside the car, is the sound which is experienced as being different.



                    The music is a higher pitch while the car is moving toward the person because the speed* of the wave is increased by the speed of the car. The pitch sounds normal for a moment because the car is not moving toward or away from the person which leaves the speed* of the sound as it is, and the pitch is lower as the car is moving away because the speed* of the sound wave is reduced by the speed of the car.



                    Application to the microwave scenario:



                    The microwave oven is like the car and the electromagnetic wave (visible or microwave) is like the sound wave of the music.



                    The electromagnetic wave being shifted is the one which has left the interior of the microwave oven.



                    The shift being observed in the electromagnetic wave is caused by a change in the speed* of the wave as it is observed relative to the observer.



                    Edit: *speed of the waves therefore increased frequency.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 22 at 18:10

























                    answered Dec 22 at 4:13









                    takintoolong

                    1194




                    1194























                        0














                        Doppler affects the observers perception. The observed does not change, so the microwaves would still be blocked and, you could not see them at all, let alone them shifted.






                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.























                          0














                          Doppler affects the observers perception. The observed does not change, so the microwaves would still be blocked and, you could not see them at all, let alone them shifted.






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                            0












                            0








                            0






                            Doppler affects the observers perception. The observed does not change, so the microwaves would still be blocked and, you could not see them at all, let alone them shifted.






                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            Doppler affects the observers perception. The observed does not change, so the microwaves would still be blocked and, you could not see them at all, let alone them shifted.







                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered Dec 23 at 12:46









                            Torque LeBoeuf

                            1




                            1




                            New contributor




                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            Torque LeBoeuf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                samwa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                samwa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                samwa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                samwa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449742%2fwhy-doesnt-the-escape-of-electromagnetic-waves-from-a-microwave-depend-on-the-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

                                Deduzione

                                Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”