A* Pathfinding for a Game












2














I'm working on a game and I have developed A* path finding for certain enemies.
But I think I have some optimization issues.
If I put the player in an area that cannot be reached and put 3 or 4 enemies around him they are forced to use A* until there are no options left.
This causes a dramatic slowdown.



There are several limiting factors that limit the area that can be searched.
If the node is out of the attack range of the enemy, if the node falls out of the viewable screen, if the node fall out of the current "area", then the node will be ignored.
So in this case with the current enemy and it's range we should be checking about an 18x18 grid.
Things to consider, I'm using the map tiles themselves as the nodes, I'm using a priority queue for the open set, although I'm forced to remove an object from it if I have to update the parent or update the G value and re add it to preserve the proper order, and I'm using a hash set for the closed list.



Not sure if I shouldn't be using the actual map as the nodes.
Since the map tiles can be checked over and over I'm also forced to set the G value to maximum the first time I come across it for the current instance of the A* so that the calculated value will always be smaller.



This path finding occurs once every cycle of the game.
The code is ready for diagonal movement but so far I'm only taking advantage of horizontal and vertical movement.
I've also tried running it with other sections of code commented out to see if something else might be causing the slowdown, but it's definitely the A*.



I ran some tests and saw that the closed set had about 280 elements in it, and the open set had around 250 when it finished checking everything, not sure if those numbers make sense.
I would think one of those should be a lot smaller considering the limitations.
I'm probably doing a lot wrong here so any tips on how to make this code more efficient would be greatly appreciated.



This is a top down 2d game like original Zelda.
The map consists of tiles each with their own attributes.
The A* path finding algorithm tries to find a path from a starting tile to an end tile using only vertical or horizontal movements.
Hope that makes it more clear about what the game is like and how it functions.



Here is the class I use for A*



    package enemiesClass;

import java.awt.Point;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Set;

import Engine.Animator;
import Engine.MapMain;

public class Astar {

private MapMain nodeStart;//starting tile
private MapMain nodeEnd;//ending tile
private Enemies enemy;
private boolean diag;//can move diagonally
private boolean isPath;//true if there is a path and flase if there is not
private ArrayList<MapMain> pathToEnd = new ArrayList<MapMain>();
private int sightDistance;// = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
private Point heroCent = Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect());//center of hero rect

public Astar(MapMain nodeStart, MapMain nodeEnd, Enemies enemy, boolean diag){
this.nodeStart = nodeStart;
this.nodeEnd = nodeEnd;
this.enemy = enemy;
this.diag = diag;
sightDistance = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
isPath = findPath();
}


private boolean findPath(){
Set<MapMain> closedSet = new HashSet<MapMain>();
Queue<MapMain> openSet = new PriorityQueue<MapMain>(11, nodeComparator);
nodeStart.setPathG(0);
nodeStart.setPathH(getDistance(nodeStart, nodeEnd));
nodeStart.setPathF(nodeStart.getPathH()+nodeStart.getPathF());
openSet.add(nodeStart);

while(!openSet.isEmpty()){

//MapMain maps = findNeighbors(openSet.peek());

MapMain currentNode = openSet.poll();
closedSet.add(currentNode);
if (currentNode.equals(nodeEnd)){
makePathToEnd();
return true;
}
//look through each neighbor
for(MapMain map: findNeighbors(currentNode)){
Point mapCent = Animator.getBoard().findMapTileCenter(map);//center point of map tile
//Line2D line = new Line2D.Double(mapCent, Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect()));

if(closedSet.contains(map)){
continue;//if this map tile was already added to closedSet
}

if(Animator.getBoard().isRectInTile(map)){
continue;//if any tile in this map space has a rect in it
}

if(mapCent.x > enemy.mapAreaBR.getX()+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < enemy.mapAreaTL.getX() ||
mapCent.y > enemy.mapAreaBR.getY()+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < enemy.mapAreaTL.getY()){
continue;//if map tile is leaving the area the enemy is in
}

if(mapCent.x > Animator.screenW+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < -Animator.scale ||
mapCent.y > Animator.screenH+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < 0){
continue;//if map tile is outside of viewable screen
}

if(!checkRange(mapCent)){
continue;//hero is out of range from the center of this tile
}

if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}

//find cost to neighbor
int tempG = currentNode.getPathG()+getDistance(currentNode, map);

//if the new G cost to the neighbor is less then the old G cost to the neighbor
if(tempG < map.getPathG()){
if(openSet.contains(map)){//if this tile is already in open set
openSet.remove(map);//remove it to make changes so the order is preserved
}
map.setPathG(tempG);//apply new G cost
map.setPathF(map.getPathH()+map.getPathG());//calculate new F cost
map.setPathParent(currentNode);//add current node as parent
openSet.add(map);//add map to open set
}
}
}

return false;

}

//find neighbor nodes
private MapMain findNeighbors(MapMain node){
int neighborCount = 4;
if(diag) neighborCount = 8;
MapMain maps = new MapMain[neighborCount];

int index = 0;

for(MapMain map: Animator.getBoard().getMapMainArrayL1()){
int mapx = map.getMapPoint().x;
int mapy = map.getMapPoint().y;
int nodex = node.getMapPoint().x;
int nodey = node.getMapPoint().y;

//create loop for checking all neighbor nodes
for(int ix = -1; ix < 2; ix++){
for(int iy = -1; iy < 2; iy++){
if(ix == 0 && iy == 0) continue;//skip if it's the middle tile which is the current node

if(mapx == nodex+ix && mapy == nodey+iy){
if(ix == 0 || iy == 0){//if horizontal or vertical node always add neighbor
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}else if(diag){//if diagonal node only add when diag is true
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}
}
}
}
}

return maps;
}

private void makePathToEnd(){
MapMain nodeCurrent = nodeEnd;
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
while(!nodeCurrent.equals(nodeStart)){
nodeCurrent = nodeCurrent.getPathParent();
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
}

Collections.reverse(pathToEnd);
}

//checks to see if the hero is in range from given spot
private boolean checkRange(Point point){
if(heroCent.y > point.y-(sightDistance) && heroCent.y < point.y+(sightDistance) &&
heroCent.x > point.x-(sightDistance) && heroCent.x < point.x+(sightDistance)){
return true;
}
return false;
}

//get distance from one map tile to another
private int getDistance(MapMain map1, MapMain map2){
int distX = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().x-map2.getMapPoint().x);
int distY = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().y-map2.getMapPoint().y);

if(distX > distY)return 14*distY+10*(distX-distY);
return 14*distX+10*(distY-distX);
}

//comparator for priority queue
private Comparator<MapMain> nodeComparator = new Comparator<MapMain>(){

@Override
public int compare(MapMain a1, MapMain a2) {

return a1.getPathF() - a2.getPathF();

}
};

public boolean isPath() {
return isPath;
}

public ArrayList<MapMain> getPathToEnd() {
return pathToEnd;
}
}


And here is the section of code that calls it



//do attack style 2 checks 
private void doAttackStyle2(){

if(checkHeroAcross() || attacking){
setAttackDraw();
bullet3attack();
return;
}


if(!findAttackSpot2()){
stopAttack();
return;
}


attackPoint = heroPoint;
Astar astar = new Astar(findClosestTile(),Animator.getBoard().getMapFromPoint(attackPoint),this,false);
if(astar.isPath()){
if(attackPause < 29){
attackAlert();
return;
}
speed = attackSpeed;
faceHero();
dy=0;
dx=0;
moving = true;

astarPath = astar.getPathToEnd();
byte tileLoc = findRectLocationInMapTile(astarPath.get(0), Animator.getBoard().getRectCorners(rect));
byte nextLoc = 0;//next location to move to
if(astarPath.size() > 1){
nextLoc = getAttackNextTile();
moveAttackPath(tileLoc,nextLoc);
}else{
moveAttackPathFinal();
}
}else{
stopAttack();
}

}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3




    Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
    – Vogel612
    Dec 22 at 11:39










  • Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:26
















2














I'm working on a game and I have developed A* path finding for certain enemies.
But I think I have some optimization issues.
If I put the player in an area that cannot be reached and put 3 or 4 enemies around him they are forced to use A* until there are no options left.
This causes a dramatic slowdown.



There are several limiting factors that limit the area that can be searched.
If the node is out of the attack range of the enemy, if the node falls out of the viewable screen, if the node fall out of the current "area", then the node will be ignored.
So in this case with the current enemy and it's range we should be checking about an 18x18 grid.
Things to consider, I'm using the map tiles themselves as the nodes, I'm using a priority queue for the open set, although I'm forced to remove an object from it if I have to update the parent or update the G value and re add it to preserve the proper order, and I'm using a hash set for the closed list.



Not sure if I shouldn't be using the actual map as the nodes.
Since the map tiles can be checked over and over I'm also forced to set the G value to maximum the first time I come across it for the current instance of the A* so that the calculated value will always be smaller.



This path finding occurs once every cycle of the game.
The code is ready for diagonal movement but so far I'm only taking advantage of horizontal and vertical movement.
I've also tried running it with other sections of code commented out to see if something else might be causing the slowdown, but it's definitely the A*.



I ran some tests and saw that the closed set had about 280 elements in it, and the open set had around 250 when it finished checking everything, not sure if those numbers make sense.
I would think one of those should be a lot smaller considering the limitations.
I'm probably doing a lot wrong here so any tips on how to make this code more efficient would be greatly appreciated.



This is a top down 2d game like original Zelda.
The map consists of tiles each with their own attributes.
The A* path finding algorithm tries to find a path from a starting tile to an end tile using only vertical or horizontal movements.
Hope that makes it more clear about what the game is like and how it functions.



Here is the class I use for A*



    package enemiesClass;

import java.awt.Point;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Set;

import Engine.Animator;
import Engine.MapMain;

public class Astar {

private MapMain nodeStart;//starting tile
private MapMain nodeEnd;//ending tile
private Enemies enemy;
private boolean diag;//can move diagonally
private boolean isPath;//true if there is a path and flase if there is not
private ArrayList<MapMain> pathToEnd = new ArrayList<MapMain>();
private int sightDistance;// = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
private Point heroCent = Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect());//center of hero rect

public Astar(MapMain nodeStart, MapMain nodeEnd, Enemies enemy, boolean diag){
this.nodeStart = nodeStart;
this.nodeEnd = nodeEnd;
this.enemy = enemy;
this.diag = diag;
sightDistance = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
isPath = findPath();
}


private boolean findPath(){
Set<MapMain> closedSet = new HashSet<MapMain>();
Queue<MapMain> openSet = new PriorityQueue<MapMain>(11, nodeComparator);
nodeStart.setPathG(0);
nodeStart.setPathH(getDistance(nodeStart, nodeEnd));
nodeStart.setPathF(nodeStart.getPathH()+nodeStart.getPathF());
openSet.add(nodeStart);

while(!openSet.isEmpty()){

//MapMain maps = findNeighbors(openSet.peek());

MapMain currentNode = openSet.poll();
closedSet.add(currentNode);
if (currentNode.equals(nodeEnd)){
makePathToEnd();
return true;
}
//look through each neighbor
for(MapMain map: findNeighbors(currentNode)){
Point mapCent = Animator.getBoard().findMapTileCenter(map);//center point of map tile
//Line2D line = new Line2D.Double(mapCent, Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect()));

if(closedSet.contains(map)){
continue;//if this map tile was already added to closedSet
}

if(Animator.getBoard().isRectInTile(map)){
continue;//if any tile in this map space has a rect in it
}

if(mapCent.x > enemy.mapAreaBR.getX()+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < enemy.mapAreaTL.getX() ||
mapCent.y > enemy.mapAreaBR.getY()+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < enemy.mapAreaTL.getY()){
continue;//if map tile is leaving the area the enemy is in
}

if(mapCent.x > Animator.screenW+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < -Animator.scale ||
mapCent.y > Animator.screenH+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < 0){
continue;//if map tile is outside of viewable screen
}

if(!checkRange(mapCent)){
continue;//hero is out of range from the center of this tile
}

if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}

//find cost to neighbor
int tempG = currentNode.getPathG()+getDistance(currentNode, map);

//if the new G cost to the neighbor is less then the old G cost to the neighbor
if(tempG < map.getPathG()){
if(openSet.contains(map)){//if this tile is already in open set
openSet.remove(map);//remove it to make changes so the order is preserved
}
map.setPathG(tempG);//apply new G cost
map.setPathF(map.getPathH()+map.getPathG());//calculate new F cost
map.setPathParent(currentNode);//add current node as parent
openSet.add(map);//add map to open set
}
}
}

return false;

}

//find neighbor nodes
private MapMain findNeighbors(MapMain node){
int neighborCount = 4;
if(diag) neighborCount = 8;
MapMain maps = new MapMain[neighborCount];

int index = 0;

for(MapMain map: Animator.getBoard().getMapMainArrayL1()){
int mapx = map.getMapPoint().x;
int mapy = map.getMapPoint().y;
int nodex = node.getMapPoint().x;
int nodey = node.getMapPoint().y;

//create loop for checking all neighbor nodes
for(int ix = -1; ix < 2; ix++){
for(int iy = -1; iy < 2; iy++){
if(ix == 0 && iy == 0) continue;//skip if it's the middle tile which is the current node

if(mapx == nodex+ix && mapy == nodey+iy){
if(ix == 0 || iy == 0){//if horizontal or vertical node always add neighbor
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}else if(diag){//if diagonal node only add when diag is true
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}
}
}
}
}

return maps;
}

private void makePathToEnd(){
MapMain nodeCurrent = nodeEnd;
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
while(!nodeCurrent.equals(nodeStart)){
nodeCurrent = nodeCurrent.getPathParent();
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
}

Collections.reverse(pathToEnd);
}

//checks to see if the hero is in range from given spot
private boolean checkRange(Point point){
if(heroCent.y > point.y-(sightDistance) && heroCent.y < point.y+(sightDistance) &&
heroCent.x > point.x-(sightDistance) && heroCent.x < point.x+(sightDistance)){
return true;
}
return false;
}

//get distance from one map tile to another
private int getDistance(MapMain map1, MapMain map2){
int distX = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().x-map2.getMapPoint().x);
int distY = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().y-map2.getMapPoint().y);

if(distX > distY)return 14*distY+10*(distX-distY);
return 14*distX+10*(distY-distX);
}

//comparator for priority queue
private Comparator<MapMain> nodeComparator = new Comparator<MapMain>(){

@Override
public int compare(MapMain a1, MapMain a2) {

return a1.getPathF() - a2.getPathF();

}
};

public boolean isPath() {
return isPath;
}

public ArrayList<MapMain> getPathToEnd() {
return pathToEnd;
}
}


And here is the section of code that calls it



//do attack style 2 checks 
private void doAttackStyle2(){

if(checkHeroAcross() || attacking){
setAttackDraw();
bullet3attack();
return;
}


if(!findAttackSpot2()){
stopAttack();
return;
}


attackPoint = heroPoint;
Astar astar = new Astar(findClosestTile(),Animator.getBoard().getMapFromPoint(attackPoint),this,false);
if(astar.isPath()){
if(attackPause < 29){
attackAlert();
return;
}
speed = attackSpeed;
faceHero();
dy=0;
dx=0;
moving = true;

astarPath = astar.getPathToEnd();
byte tileLoc = findRectLocationInMapTile(astarPath.get(0), Animator.getBoard().getRectCorners(rect));
byte nextLoc = 0;//next location to move to
if(astarPath.size() > 1){
nextLoc = getAttackNextTile();
moveAttackPath(tileLoc,nextLoc);
}else{
moveAttackPathFinal();
}
}else{
stopAttack();
}

}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3




    Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
    – Vogel612
    Dec 22 at 11:39










  • Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:26














2












2








2







I'm working on a game and I have developed A* path finding for certain enemies.
But I think I have some optimization issues.
If I put the player in an area that cannot be reached and put 3 or 4 enemies around him they are forced to use A* until there are no options left.
This causes a dramatic slowdown.



There are several limiting factors that limit the area that can be searched.
If the node is out of the attack range of the enemy, if the node falls out of the viewable screen, if the node fall out of the current "area", then the node will be ignored.
So in this case with the current enemy and it's range we should be checking about an 18x18 grid.
Things to consider, I'm using the map tiles themselves as the nodes, I'm using a priority queue for the open set, although I'm forced to remove an object from it if I have to update the parent or update the G value and re add it to preserve the proper order, and I'm using a hash set for the closed list.



Not sure if I shouldn't be using the actual map as the nodes.
Since the map tiles can be checked over and over I'm also forced to set the G value to maximum the first time I come across it for the current instance of the A* so that the calculated value will always be smaller.



This path finding occurs once every cycle of the game.
The code is ready for diagonal movement but so far I'm only taking advantage of horizontal and vertical movement.
I've also tried running it with other sections of code commented out to see if something else might be causing the slowdown, but it's definitely the A*.



I ran some tests and saw that the closed set had about 280 elements in it, and the open set had around 250 when it finished checking everything, not sure if those numbers make sense.
I would think one of those should be a lot smaller considering the limitations.
I'm probably doing a lot wrong here so any tips on how to make this code more efficient would be greatly appreciated.



This is a top down 2d game like original Zelda.
The map consists of tiles each with their own attributes.
The A* path finding algorithm tries to find a path from a starting tile to an end tile using only vertical or horizontal movements.
Hope that makes it more clear about what the game is like and how it functions.



Here is the class I use for A*



    package enemiesClass;

import java.awt.Point;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Set;

import Engine.Animator;
import Engine.MapMain;

public class Astar {

private MapMain nodeStart;//starting tile
private MapMain nodeEnd;//ending tile
private Enemies enemy;
private boolean diag;//can move diagonally
private boolean isPath;//true if there is a path and flase if there is not
private ArrayList<MapMain> pathToEnd = new ArrayList<MapMain>();
private int sightDistance;// = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
private Point heroCent = Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect());//center of hero rect

public Astar(MapMain nodeStart, MapMain nodeEnd, Enemies enemy, boolean diag){
this.nodeStart = nodeStart;
this.nodeEnd = nodeEnd;
this.enemy = enemy;
this.diag = diag;
sightDistance = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
isPath = findPath();
}


private boolean findPath(){
Set<MapMain> closedSet = new HashSet<MapMain>();
Queue<MapMain> openSet = new PriorityQueue<MapMain>(11, nodeComparator);
nodeStart.setPathG(0);
nodeStart.setPathH(getDistance(nodeStart, nodeEnd));
nodeStart.setPathF(nodeStart.getPathH()+nodeStart.getPathF());
openSet.add(nodeStart);

while(!openSet.isEmpty()){

//MapMain maps = findNeighbors(openSet.peek());

MapMain currentNode = openSet.poll();
closedSet.add(currentNode);
if (currentNode.equals(nodeEnd)){
makePathToEnd();
return true;
}
//look through each neighbor
for(MapMain map: findNeighbors(currentNode)){
Point mapCent = Animator.getBoard().findMapTileCenter(map);//center point of map tile
//Line2D line = new Line2D.Double(mapCent, Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect()));

if(closedSet.contains(map)){
continue;//if this map tile was already added to closedSet
}

if(Animator.getBoard().isRectInTile(map)){
continue;//if any tile in this map space has a rect in it
}

if(mapCent.x > enemy.mapAreaBR.getX()+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < enemy.mapAreaTL.getX() ||
mapCent.y > enemy.mapAreaBR.getY()+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < enemy.mapAreaTL.getY()){
continue;//if map tile is leaving the area the enemy is in
}

if(mapCent.x > Animator.screenW+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < -Animator.scale ||
mapCent.y > Animator.screenH+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < 0){
continue;//if map tile is outside of viewable screen
}

if(!checkRange(mapCent)){
continue;//hero is out of range from the center of this tile
}

if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}

//find cost to neighbor
int tempG = currentNode.getPathG()+getDistance(currentNode, map);

//if the new G cost to the neighbor is less then the old G cost to the neighbor
if(tempG < map.getPathG()){
if(openSet.contains(map)){//if this tile is already in open set
openSet.remove(map);//remove it to make changes so the order is preserved
}
map.setPathG(tempG);//apply new G cost
map.setPathF(map.getPathH()+map.getPathG());//calculate new F cost
map.setPathParent(currentNode);//add current node as parent
openSet.add(map);//add map to open set
}
}
}

return false;

}

//find neighbor nodes
private MapMain findNeighbors(MapMain node){
int neighborCount = 4;
if(diag) neighborCount = 8;
MapMain maps = new MapMain[neighborCount];

int index = 0;

for(MapMain map: Animator.getBoard().getMapMainArrayL1()){
int mapx = map.getMapPoint().x;
int mapy = map.getMapPoint().y;
int nodex = node.getMapPoint().x;
int nodey = node.getMapPoint().y;

//create loop for checking all neighbor nodes
for(int ix = -1; ix < 2; ix++){
for(int iy = -1; iy < 2; iy++){
if(ix == 0 && iy == 0) continue;//skip if it's the middle tile which is the current node

if(mapx == nodex+ix && mapy == nodey+iy){
if(ix == 0 || iy == 0){//if horizontal or vertical node always add neighbor
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}else if(diag){//if diagonal node only add when diag is true
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}
}
}
}
}

return maps;
}

private void makePathToEnd(){
MapMain nodeCurrent = nodeEnd;
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
while(!nodeCurrent.equals(nodeStart)){
nodeCurrent = nodeCurrent.getPathParent();
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
}

Collections.reverse(pathToEnd);
}

//checks to see if the hero is in range from given spot
private boolean checkRange(Point point){
if(heroCent.y > point.y-(sightDistance) && heroCent.y < point.y+(sightDistance) &&
heroCent.x > point.x-(sightDistance) && heroCent.x < point.x+(sightDistance)){
return true;
}
return false;
}

//get distance from one map tile to another
private int getDistance(MapMain map1, MapMain map2){
int distX = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().x-map2.getMapPoint().x);
int distY = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().y-map2.getMapPoint().y);

if(distX > distY)return 14*distY+10*(distX-distY);
return 14*distX+10*(distY-distX);
}

//comparator for priority queue
private Comparator<MapMain> nodeComparator = new Comparator<MapMain>(){

@Override
public int compare(MapMain a1, MapMain a2) {

return a1.getPathF() - a2.getPathF();

}
};

public boolean isPath() {
return isPath;
}

public ArrayList<MapMain> getPathToEnd() {
return pathToEnd;
}
}


And here is the section of code that calls it



//do attack style 2 checks 
private void doAttackStyle2(){

if(checkHeroAcross() || attacking){
setAttackDraw();
bullet3attack();
return;
}


if(!findAttackSpot2()){
stopAttack();
return;
}


attackPoint = heroPoint;
Astar astar = new Astar(findClosestTile(),Animator.getBoard().getMapFromPoint(attackPoint),this,false);
if(astar.isPath()){
if(attackPause < 29){
attackAlert();
return;
}
speed = attackSpeed;
faceHero();
dy=0;
dx=0;
moving = true;

astarPath = astar.getPathToEnd();
byte tileLoc = findRectLocationInMapTile(astarPath.get(0), Animator.getBoard().getRectCorners(rect));
byte nextLoc = 0;//next location to move to
if(astarPath.size() > 1){
nextLoc = getAttackNextTile();
moveAttackPath(tileLoc,nextLoc);
}else{
moveAttackPathFinal();
}
}else{
stopAttack();
}

}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm working on a game and I have developed A* path finding for certain enemies.
But I think I have some optimization issues.
If I put the player in an area that cannot be reached and put 3 or 4 enemies around him they are forced to use A* until there are no options left.
This causes a dramatic slowdown.



There are several limiting factors that limit the area that can be searched.
If the node is out of the attack range of the enemy, if the node falls out of the viewable screen, if the node fall out of the current "area", then the node will be ignored.
So in this case with the current enemy and it's range we should be checking about an 18x18 grid.
Things to consider, I'm using the map tiles themselves as the nodes, I'm using a priority queue for the open set, although I'm forced to remove an object from it if I have to update the parent or update the G value and re add it to preserve the proper order, and I'm using a hash set for the closed list.



Not sure if I shouldn't be using the actual map as the nodes.
Since the map tiles can be checked over and over I'm also forced to set the G value to maximum the first time I come across it for the current instance of the A* so that the calculated value will always be smaller.



This path finding occurs once every cycle of the game.
The code is ready for diagonal movement but so far I'm only taking advantage of horizontal and vertical movement.
I've also tried running it with other sections of code commented out to see if something else might be causing the slowdown, but it's definitely the A*.



I ran some tests and saw that the closed set had about 280 elements in it, and the open set had around 250 when it finished checking everything, not sure if those numbers make sense.
I would think one of those should be a lot smaller considering the limitations.
I'm probably doing a lot wrong here so any tips on how to make this code more efficient would be greatly appreciated.



This is a top down 2d game like original Zelda.
The map consists of tiles each with their own attributes.
The A* path finding algorithm tries to find a path from a starting tile to an end tile using only vertical or horizontal movements.
Hope that makes it more clear about what the game is like and how it functions.



Here is the class I use for A*



    package enemiesClass;

import java.awt.Point;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Set;

import Engine.Animator;
import Engine.MapMain;

public class Astar {

private MapMain nodeStart;//starting tile
private MapMain nodeEnd;//ending tile
private Enemies enemy;
private boolean diag;//can move diagonally
private boolean isPath;//true if there is a path and flase if there is not
private ArrayList<MapMain> pathToEnd = new ArrayList<MapMain>();
private int sightDistance;// = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
private Point heroCent = Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect());//center of hero rect

public Astar(MapMain nodeStart, MapMain nodeEnd, Enemies enemy, boolean diag){
this.nodeStart = nodeStart;
this.nodeEnd = nodeEnd;
this.enemy = enemy;
this.diag = diag;
sightDistance = enemy.sightAttackRange*Animator.scale;//the maximum distance the enemy can see while attacking
isPath = findPath();
}


private boolean findPath(){
Set<MapMain> closedSet = new HashSet<MapMain>();
Queue<MapMain> openSet = new PriorityQueue<MapMain>(11, nodeComparator);
nodeStart.setPathG(0);
nodeStart.setPathH(getDistance(nodeStart, nodeEnd));
nodeStart.setPathF(nodeStart.getPathH()+nodeStart.getPathF());
openSet.add(nodeStart);

while(!openSet.isEmpty()){

//MapMain maps = findNeighbors(openSet.peek());

MapMain currentNode = openSet.poll();
closedSet.add(currentNode);
if (currentNode.equals(nodeEnd)){
makePathToEnd();
return true;
}
//look through each neighbor
for(MapMain map: findNeighbors(currentNode)){
Point mapCent = Animator.getBoard().findMapTileCenter(map);//center point of map tile
//Line2D line = new Line2D.Double(mapCent, Animator.getBoard().findCenter(Animator.getBoard().getHero().getRect()));

if(closedSet.contains(map)){
continue;//if this map tile was already added to closedSet
}

if(Animator.getBoard().isRectInTile(map)){
continue;//if any tile in this map space has a rect in it
}

if(mapCent.x > enemy.mapAreaBR.getX()+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < enemy.mapAreaTL.getX() ||
mapCent.y > enemy.mapAreaBR.getY()+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < enemy.mapAreaTL.getY()){
continue;//if map tile is leaving the area the enemy is in
}

if(mapCent.x > Animator.screenW+Animator.scale || mapCent.x < -Animator.scale ||
mapCent.y > Animator.screenH+Animator.scale || mapCent.y < 0){
continue;//if map tile is outside of viewable screen
}

if(!checkRange(mapCent)){
continue;//hero is out of range from the center of this tile
}

if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}

//find cost to neighbor
int tempG = currentNode.getPathG()+getDistance(currentNode, map);

//if the new G cost to the neighbor is less then the old G cost to the neighbor
if(tempG < map.getPathG()){
if(openSet.contains(map)){//if this tile is already in open set
openSet.remove(map);//remove it to make changes so the order is preserved
}
map.setPathG(tempG);//apply new G cost
map.setPathF(map.getPathH()+map.getPathG());//calculate new F cost
map.setPathParent(currentNode);//add current node as parent
openSet.add(map);//add map to open set
}
}
}

return false;

}

//find neighbor nodes
private MapMain findNeighbors(MapMain node){
int neighborCount = 4;
if(diag) neighborCount = 8;
MapMain maps = new MapMain[neighborCount];

int index = 0;

for(MapMain map: Animator.getBoard().getMapMainArrayL1()){
int mapx = map.getMapPoint().x;
int mapy = map.getMapPoint().y;
int nodex = node.getMapPoint().x;
int nodey = node.getMapPoint().y;

//create loop for checking all neighbor nodes
for(int ix = -1; ix < 2; ix++){
for(int iy = -1; iy < 2; iy++){
if(ix == 0 && iy == 0) continue;//skip if it's the middle tile which is the current node

if(mapx == nodex+ix && mapy == nodey+iy){
if(ix == 0 || iy == 0){//if horizontal or vertical node always add neighbor
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}else if(diag){//if diagonal node only add when diag is true
maps[index] = map;
index++;
}
}
}
}
}

return maps;
}

private void makePathToEnd(){
MapMain nodeCurrent = nodeEnd;
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
while(!nodeCurrent.equals(nodeStart)){
nodeCurrent = nodeCurrent.getPathParent();
pathToEnd.add(nodeCurrent);
}

Collections.reverse(pathToEnd);
}

//checks to see if the hero is in range from given spot
private boolean checkRange(Point point){
if(heroCent.y > point.y-(sightDistance) && heroCent.y < point.y+(sightDistance) &&
heroCent.x > point.x-(sightDistance) && heroCent.x < point.x+(sightDistance)){
return true;
}
return false;
}

//get distance from one map tile to another
private int getDistance(MapMain map1, MapMain map2){
int distX = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().x-map2.getMapPoint().x);
int distY = Math.abs(map1.getMapPoint().y-map2.getMapPoint().y);

if(distX > distY)return 14*distY+10*(distX-distY);
return 14*distX+10*(distY-distX);
}

//comparator for priority queue
private Comparator<MapMain> nodeComparator = new Comparator<MapMain>(){

@Override
public int compare(MapMain a1, MapMain a2) {

return a1.getPathF() - a2.getPathF();

}
};

public boolean isPath() {
return isPath;
}

public ArrayList<MapMain> getPathToEnd() {
return pathToEnd;
}
}


And here is the section of code that calls it



//do attack style 2 checks 
private void doAttackStyle2(){

if(checkHeroAcross() || attacking){
setAttackDraw();
bullet3attack();
return;
}


if(!findAttackSpot2()){
stopAttack();
return;
}


attackPoint = heroPoint;
Astar astar = new Astar(findClosestTile(),Animator.getBoard().getMapFromPoint(attackPoint),this,false);
if(astar.isPath()){
if(attackPause < 29){
attackAlert();
return;
}
speed = attackSpeed;
faceHero();
dy=0;
dx=0;
moving = true;

astarPath = astar.getPathToEnd();
byte tileLoc = findRectLocationInMapTile(astarPath.get(0), Animator.getBoard().getRectCorners(rect));
byte nextLoc = 0;//next location to move to
if(astarPath.size() > 1){
nextLoc = getAttackNextTile();
moveAttackPath(tileLoc,nextLoc);
}else{
moveAttackPathFinal();
}
}else{
stopAttack();
}

}






java game a-star






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 22 at 11:41









Vogel612

21.3k346128




21.3k346128






New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 22 at 7:20









Sark

184




184




New contributor




Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sark is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3




    Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
    – Vogel612
    Dec 22 at 11:39










  • Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:26














  • 3




    Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
    – Vogel612
    Dec 22 at 11:39










  • Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:26








3




3




Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
– Vogel612
Dec 22 at 11:39




Not quite enough for a full review, but: Why are you running full A* on every tick of your game? Usually you wouldn't need to do that. Most A* results will be at least useful for a few ticks or even seconds.
– Vogel612
Dec 22 at 11:39












Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
– Sark
Dec 22 at 17:26




Thanks! I was wondering if that was necessary. Never used A* before so I wasn't sure how it needs to work. I'll reduce the useage of it and see how it turns out.
– Sark
Dec 22 at 17:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Calling PriorityQueue.contains is O(n) in the size of the priority queue and this ruins your performance.



For example here:



if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}


It is ok to have duplicates in the open set just check if the current node is in the closed set when you pull it out of the open set before continuing with it. Or if you don't like that, you can have a parallel open set to the open priority queue.






share|improve this answer























  • Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 22 at 9:32










  • One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:31












  • Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
    – Emily L.
    Dec 22 at 17:58










  • I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 18:06










  • I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
    – Sark
    Dec 24 at 6:35













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Sark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210156%2fa-pathfinding-for-a-game%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Calling PriorityQueue.contains is O(n) in the size of the priority queue and this ruins your performance.



For example here:



if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}


It is ok to have duplicates in the open set just check if the current node is in the closed set when you pull it out of the open set before continuing with it. Or if you don't like that, you can have a parallel open set to the open priority queue.






share|improve this answer























  • Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 22 at 9:32










  • One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:31












  • Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
    – Emily L.
    Dec 22 at 17:58










  • I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 18:06










  • I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
    – Sark
    Dec 24 at 6:35


















5














Calling PriorityQueue.contains is O(n) in the size of the priority queue and this ruins your performance.



For example here:



if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}


It is ok to have duplicates in the open set just check if the current node is in the closed set when you pull it out of the open set before continuing with it. Or if you don't like that, you can have a parallel open set to the open priority queue.






share|improve this answer























  • Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 22 at 9:32










  • One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:31












  • Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
    – Emily L.
    Dec 22 at 17:58










  • I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 18:06










  • I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
    – Sark
    Dec 24 at 6:35
















5












5








5






Calling PriorityQueue.contains is O(n) in the size of the priority queue and this ruins your performance.



For example here:



if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}


It is ok to have duplicates in the open set just check if the current node is in the closed set when you pull it out of the open set before continuing with it. Or if you don't like that, you can have a parallel open set to the open priority queue.






share|improve this answer














Calling PriorityQueue.contains is O(n) in the size of the priority queue and this ruins your performance.



For example here:



if(!openSet.contains(map)){
map.setPathG(Integer.MAX_VALUE);//if this tile has not been added set the G to max value
map.setPathH(getDistance(map, nodeEnd));//find cost to to end node
}


It is ok to have duplicates in the open set just check if the current node is in the closed set when you pull it out of the open set before continuing with it. Or if you don't like that, you can have a parallel open set to the open priority queue.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 22 at 11:43

























answered Dec 22 at 9:28









Emily L.

11.5k12373




11.5k12373












  • Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 22 at 9:32










  • One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:31












  • Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
    – Emily L.
    Dec 22 at 17:58










  • I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 18:06










  • I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
    – Sark
    Dec 24 at 6:35




















  • Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 22 at 9:32










  • One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 17:31












  • Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
    – Emily L.
    Dec 22 at 17:58










  • I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
    – Sark
    Dec 22 at 18:06










  • I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
    – Sark
    Dec 24 at 6:35


















Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Dec 22 at 9:32




Or use a priority queue with O(1) contains!. That's for C# though - unfortunately I'm not aware of one for Java, but it is open source...
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Dec 22 at 9:32












One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
– Sark
Dec 22 at 17:31






One of the reasons I need to check if it's not in open set yet is because I'm using the actual map tiles as the nodes. It's very likely the tile has been used in the past and already has a G value set. The G value has to be reset so it can be compared. But this may be a flawed method. I'll look into creating separate nodes so this won't be needed. Once I see the performance increase I'll check this answer. Thanks for the tip!
– Sark
Dec 22 at 17:31














Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
– Emily L.
Dec 22 at 17:58




Storing ephemeral data pertaining to the path finding in the actual map tiles is a Bad Idea TM, for one you are preventing yourself from paralleling the A* search for the different agents for example. Also it's just the wrong place for this data.
– Emily L.
Dec 22 at 17:58












I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
– Sark
Dec 22 at 18:06




I was always worried about doing that. That's why I pointed it out. The game runs in a single thread so it wouldn't run parallel, but still it's bad practice. And I totally now see how I ruined the purpose of the priority queue by forcing the game to run through the entire queue each time. I'm pretty sure when I eliminate it I'll see a performance boost. Just didn't realize what I was doing at the time.
– Sark
Dec 22 at 18:06












I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
– Sark
Dec 24 at 6:35






I've hit a wall. The priority queue comparable value can change during the coarse of the algorithm. Any attempt to remove an element and restructure the queue results in 0(n). I'm not sure what you mean by don't worry about duplicates? In order to check contains I have to compare objects, if openSet just got new objects added each time it would always add new objects to closed set. Maybe I misunderstood what you were trying to say? I know there are other heaps that can do 0(1) removal, but they don't come in stock java it doesn't look.
– Sark
Dec 24 at 6:35












Sark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Sark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Sark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Sark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210156%2fa-pathfinding-for-a-game%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

Deduzione

Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”