Extracting data in ES6











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have this array const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"] and an object



const blueprints = {
12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
}


How can I return an array of the following objects that have all front, back, top, and bottom using ES6 map/filter/some and etc?:



result =[
{colorId: "12", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "73", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "4", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
]


I did it here but I feel like it is too messy and hard to read. Anybody could recommend on how to shorten it and make it easier to read using the ES6 functions (map, filter ...)?



const result = idArray.map(id => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
const exists = bluePrint.views.some(view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom');

if (exists) {
return {
colorId: id,
views: bluePrint.views
}
}
}).filter(bluePrint => bluePrint);









share|improve this question




















  • 2




    You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
    – 200_success
    Nov 15 at 18:49






  • 1




    Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
    – Carcigenicate
    Nov 15 at 19:30

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have this array const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"] and an object



const blueprints = {
12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
}


How can I return an array of the following objects that have all front, back, top, and bottom using ES6 map/filter/some and etc?:



result =[
{colorId: "12", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "73", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "4", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
]


I did it here but I feel like it is too messy and hard to read. Anybody could recommend on how to shorten it and make it easier to read using the ES6 functions (map, filter ...)?



const result = idArray.map(id => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
const exists = bluePrint.views.some(view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom');

if (exists) {
return {
colorId: id,
views: bluePrint.views
}
}
}).filter(bluePrint => bluePrint);









share|improve this question




















  • 2




    You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
    – 200_success
    Nov 15 at 18:49






  • 1




    Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
    – Carcigenicate
    Nov 15 at 19:30















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have this array const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"] and an object



const blueprints = {
12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
}


How can I return an array of the following objects that have all front, back, top, and bottom using ES6 map/filter/some and etc?:



result =[
{colorId: "12", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "73", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "4", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
]


I did it here but I feel like it is too messy and hard to read. Anybody could recommend on how to shorten it and make it easier to read using the ES6 functions (map, filter ...)?



const result = idArray.map(id => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
const exists = bluePrint.views.some(view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom');

if (exists) {
return {
colorId: id,
views: bluePrint.views
}
}
}).filter(bluePrint => bluePrint);









share|improve this question















I have this array const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"] and an object



const blueprints = {
12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
}


How can I return an array of the following objects that have all front, back, top, and bottom using ES6 map/filter/some and etc?:



result =[
{colorId: "12", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "73", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
{colorId: "4", views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]}
]


I did it here but I feel like it is too messy and hard to read. Anybody could recommend on how to shorten it and make it easier to read using the ES6 functions (map, filter ...)?



const result = idArray.map(id => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
const exists = bluePrint.views.some(view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom');

if (exists) {
return {
colorId: id,
views: bluePrint.views
}
}
}).filter(bluePrint => bluePrint);






javascript ecmascript-6 iteration






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 20:59









Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

7,73061748




7,73061748










asked Nov 15 at 18:42









ssss

91




91








  • 2




    You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
    – 200_success
    Nov 15 at 18:49






  • 1




    Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
    – Carcigenicate
    Nov 15 at 19:30
















  • 2




    You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
    – 200_success
    Nov 15 at 18:49






  • 1




    Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
    – Carcigenicate
    Nov 15 at 19:30










2




2




You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
– 200_success
Nov 15 at 18:49




You have some mismatched quotes in your JSON?
– 200_success
Nov 15 at 18:49




1




1




Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
– Carcigenicate
Nov 15 at 19:30






Even once you fix the quotes, blueprints causes "Uncaught ReferenceError: red is not defined". Please post usable data.
– Carcigenicate
Nov 15 at 19:30












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













The initial data is not formatted as proper JSON. There appear to be mismatched quotes around values like front, back, etc... try running the snippet below to see the error that is caused by this.






const blueprints = {
12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
}





Also, unless red, white, black and silver are defined as variables, they need to be enclosed in quotes as string literals. See the rewrite below for a sample of this.





The indentation is inconsistent- the first level in the .map() callback is four spaces and then two spaces within the if block. Stick with one or the other.





You could use Array.prototype.reduce() to conditionally add the desired elements to an output array, reducing the need to call .filter():



const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
//conditionally add to output and then return it
return output;
}, );


You could also use Object.keys() to iterate over the keys of bluePrints instead of idArray, though it appears to be slightly slower (see performance link below).



const result = Object.keys(bluePrints).reduce((output,id) => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
//conditionally add to output and then return it
return output;
}, );


See a comparison of the three snippets in this jsPerf.





One other change for readability would be to move that filter function outside the call to .map() or .reduce():



const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom'


Then that function can be called within the call to .some():



const exists = bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom);


And then that boolean exists could be eliminated by moving the call to .some() into the conditional statement of the if:



if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
//add to array




Proposed Rewrite






const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
const bluePrints = {
12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
};
const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
output.push({
colorId: id,
views: bluePrint.views
});
}
return output;
}, );
console.log('result,', result);








share|improve this answer























  • Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
    – konijn
    Nov 16 at 9:26










  • Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
    – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
    Nov 17 at 15:27


















up vote
0
down vote













Keeping it simple



One big problem that coders must face is complexity. Complexity is many times the actual result of wanting to simplify code readability, but often this is at the expense of functional and source simplicity.



Complexity propagates throughout a project. In the example of your code the view name objects {name : "top"} means that at all levels of the project the need to access a view by name requires the additional object property reference "name". On a large project the seamingly simple use of a named property can add dozens or more lines of source code.



Simplicity means looking further than just the immediate code, but how data structure, data sources, and access methods effect code complexity throughout the project.



Sources of complexity




  1. Data duplication


You have some data duplication.



The array idArray is a duplication of the blueprints keys and can be computed using Object.keys(bluePrints) or better still use a for loop to extract both the id and value of each entry in bluePrint.





  1. Expression of the implied


The view array has objects containing just one property {name : "bottom"}, ... which just adds complication. Why not just have an array of view names. This will make future manipulation easier.



eg finding a view in array of string is



const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.includes(viewName);


As opposed to the more complicated search that requires an addition call stack item, associated context, and additional references.



const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.some(view => view.name === viewName);



  1. Indirect references


The property colorId is an indirect reference to an object in a, (I am guessing) map, mapLike, or array of colors.



This means that each time you need to handle the print's color you need to include code that locates the color by Id. You can simplify by using a direct reference to the color, you thus don't need to lookup the color by Id each time you need it. Saving functional and source complexity.



Example



This makes some assumptions about your project and code and is only meant as an example. How your project is structured is unknown and will affect the quality of this example.



An alternative blueprint filter as a function that has an argument pertaining to the filter criteria, removing view name object in favour of the simpler string, and directly referencing the colors.



// arg views is array of strings ["top", "bottom"]
const filterPrintsByViews = (prints, ...views) => {
const result = ;
for (const [id, value] of Object.entries(prints)) {
if (views.every(name => value.views.some(view => view.name === name))) {
result.push({colorRef: colors[id], views: value.views.map(view => view.name)});
}
}
return result;
}

// Data sources ============================================
// assuming that id and value are not uinque
const colors = {
"12": {color: "red"},
"231":{color: "white"},
"73": {color: "black"},
"4": {color: "silver"},
"20": {color: "silver"}, // second case of silver
};

const blueprints = {
"12":{color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
"231":{color: "blue", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
"73":{color: "cyan", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
"4":{color: "gold", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
};


// Usage =========================================================
const result = filterPrintsByViews(bluePrints, "top", "bottom");


// Example of resulting data
// result looks like
[
{colorRef: {color: "red"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
{colorRef: {color: "black"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
{colorRef: {color: "silver"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
];





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207744%2fextracting-data-in-es6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The initial data is not formatted as proper JSON. There appear to be mismatched quotes around values like front, back, etc... try running the snippet below to see the error that is caused by this.






    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    Also, unless red, white, black and silver are defined as variables, they need to be enclosed in quotes as string literals. See the rewrite below for a sample of this.





    The indentation is inconsistent- the first level in the .map() callback is four spaces and then two spaces within the if block. Stick with one or the other.





    You could use Array.prototype.reduce() to conditionally add the desired elements to an output array, reducing the need to call .filter():



    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    You could also use Object.keys() to iterate over the keys of bluePrints instead of idArray, though it appears to be slightly slower (see performance link below).



    const result = Object.keys(bluePrints).reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    See a comparison of the three snippets in this jsPerf.





    One other change for readability would be to move that filter function outside the call to .map() or .reduce():



    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom'


    Then that function can be called within the call to .some():



    const exists = bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom);


    And then that boolean exists could be eliminated by moving the call to .some() into the conditional statement of the if:



    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    //add to array




    Proposed Rewrite






    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);








    share|improve this answer























    • Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
      – konijn
      Nov 16 at 9:26










    • Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      Nov 17 at 15:27















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The initial data is not formatted as proper JSON. There appear to be mismatched quotes around values like front, back, etc... try running the snippet below to see the error that is caused by this.






    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    Also, unless red, white, black and silver are defined as variables, they need to be enclosed in quotes as string literals. See the rewrite below for a sample of this.





    The indentation is inconsistent- the first level in the .map() callback is four spaces and then two spaces within the if block. Stick with one or the other.





    You could use Array.prototype.reduce() to conditionally add the desired elements to an output array, reducing the need to call .filter():



    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    You could also use Object.keys() to iterate over the keys of bluePrints instead of idArray, though it appears to be slightly slower (see performance link below).



    const result = Object.keys(bluePrints).reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    See a comparison of the three snippets in this jsPerf.





    One other change for readability would be to move that filter function outside the call to .map() or .reduce():



    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom'


    Then that function can be called within the call to .some():



    const exists = bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom);


    And then that boolean exists could be eliminated by moving the call to .some() into the conditional statement of the if:



    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    //add to array




    Proposed Rewrite






    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);








    share|improve this answer























    • Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
      – konijn
      Nov 16 at 9:26










    • Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      Nov 17 at 15:27













    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    The initial data is not formatted as proper JSON. There appear to be mismatched quotes around values like front, back, etc... try running the snippet below to see the error that is caused by this.






    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    Also, unless red, white, black and silver are defined as variables, they need to be enclosed in quotes as string literals. See the rewrite below for a sample of this.





    The indentation is inconsistent- the first level in the .map() callback is four spaces and then two spaces within the if block. Stick with one or the other.





    You could use Array.prototype.reduce() to conditionally add the desired elements to an output array, reducing the need to call .filter():



    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    You could also use Object.keys() to iterate over the keys of bluePrints instead of idArray, though it appears to be slightly slower (see performance link below).



    const result = Object.keys(bluePrints).reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    See a comparison of the three snippets in this jsPerf.





    One other change for readability would be to move that filter function outside the call to .map() or .reduce():



    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom'


    Then that function can be called within the call to .some():



    const exists = bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom);


    And then that boolean exists could be eliminated by moving the call to .some() into the conditional statement of the if:



    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    //add to array




    Proposed Rewrite






    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);








    share|improve this answer














    The initial data is not formatted as proper JSON. There appear to be mismatched quotes around values like front, back, etc... try running the snippet below to see the error that is caused by this.






    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    Also, unless red, white, black and silver are defined as variables, they need to be enclosed in quotes as string literals. See the rewrite below for a sample of this.





    The indentation is inconsistent- the first level in the .map() callback is four spaces and then two spaces within the if block. Stick with one or the other.





    You could use Array.prototype.reduce() to conditionally add the desired elements to an output array, reducing the need to call .filter():



    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    You could also use Object.keys() to iterate over the keys of bluePrints instead of idArray, though it appears to be slightly slower (see performance link below).



    const result = Object.keys(bluePrints).reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    //conditionally add to output and then return it
    return output;
    }, );


    See a comparison of the three snippets in this jsPerf.





    One other change for readability would be to move that filter function outside the call to .map() or .reduce():



    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom'


    Then that function can be called within the call to .some():



    const exists = bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom);


    And then that boolean exists could be eliminated by moving the call to .some() into the conditional statement of the if:



    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    //add to array




    Proposed Rewrite






    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);








    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    const blueprints = {
    12: {color: red, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    231: {color: white, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}]},
    73: {color: black, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    4: {color: silver, views: [{name: "front}, {name: "back}, {name: "top}, {name: "bottom}]},
    }





    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);





    const idArray = ["12", "231", "73", "4"];
    const bluePrints = {
    12: {color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    231: {color: "white", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    73: {color: "black", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    4: {color: "silver", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };
    const viewIsTopOrBottom = view => view.name === 'top' || view.name === 'bottom';
    const result = idArray.reduce((output,id) => {
    const bluePrint = bluePrints[id];
    if (bluePrint.views.some(viewIsTopOrBottom)) {
    output.push({
    colorId: id,
    views: bluePrint.views
    });
    }
    return output;
    }, );
    console.log('result,', result);






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 17 at 15:24

























    answered Nov 15 at 20:59









    Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

    7,73061748




    7,73061748












    • Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
      – konijn
      Nov 16 at 9:26










    • Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      Nov 17 at 15:27


















    • Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
      – konijn
      Nov 16 at 9:26










    • Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
      – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
      Nov 17 at 15:27
















    Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
    – konijn
    Nov 16 at 9:26




    Nice answer, I +1'd. I still would have liked to see a final version with your final suggestions (which are all good)
    – konijn
    Nov 16 at 9:26












    Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
    – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
    Nov 17 at 15:27




    Thanks- I restructured it; since the OP is unregistered I wonder if he or she will see it but maybe he or she will register (and as you know can then have accounts merged).
    – Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
    Nov 17 at 15:27












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Keeping it simple



    One big problem that coders must face is complexity. Complexity is many times the actual result of wanting to simplify code readability, but often this is at the expense of functional and source simplicity.



    Complexity propagates throughout a project. In the example of your code the view name objects {name : "top"} means that at all levels of the project the need to access a view by name requires the additional object property reference "name". On a large project the seamingly simple use of a named property can add dozens or more lines of source code.



    Simplicity means looking further than just the immediate code, but how data structure, data sources, and access methods effect code complexity throughout the project.



    Sources of complexity




    1. Data duplication


    You have some data duplication.



    The array idArray is a duplication of the blueprints keys and can be computed using Object.keys(bluePrints) or better still use a for loop to extract both the id and value of each entry in bluePrint.





    1. Expression of the implied


    The view array has objects containing just one property {name : "bottom"}, ... which just adds complication. Why not just have an array of view names. This will make future manipulation easier.



    eg finding a view in array of string is



    const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.includes(viewName);


    As opposed to the more complicated search that requires an addition call stack item, associated context, and additional references.



    const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.some(view => view.name === viewName);



    1. Indirect references


    The property colorId is an indirect reference to an object in a, (I am guessing) map, mapLike, or array of colors.



    This means that each time you need to handle the print's color you need to include code that locates the color by Id. You can simplify by using a direct reference to the color, you thus don't need to lookup the color by Id each time you need it. Saving functional and source complexity.



    Example



    This makes some assumptions about your project and code and is only meant as an example. How your project is structured is unknown and will affect the quality of this example.



    An alternative blueprint filter as a function that has an argument pertaining to the filter criteria, removing view name object in favour of the simpler string, and directly referencing the colors.



    // arg views is array of strings ["top", "bottom"]
    const filterPrintsByViews = (prints, ...views) => {
    const result = ;
    for (const [id, value] of Object.entries(prints)) {
    if (views.every(name => value.views.some(view => view.name === name))) {
    result.push({colorRef: colors[id], views: value.views.map(view => view.name)});
    }
    }
    return result;
    }

    // Data sources ============================================
    // assuming that id and value are not uinque
    const colors = {
    "12": {color: "red"},
    "231":{color: "white"},
    "73": {color: "black"},
    "4": {color: "silver"},
    "20": {color: "silver"}, // second case of silver
    };

    const blueprints = {
    "12":{color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    "231":{color: "blue", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
    "73":{color: "cyan", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    "4":{color: "gold", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
    };


    // Usage =========================================================
    const result = filterPrintsByViews(bluePrints, "top", "bottom");


    // Example of resulting data
    // result looks like
    [
    {colorRef: {color: "red"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
    {colorRef: {color: "black"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
    {colorRef: {color: "silver"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
    ];





    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Keeping it simple



      One big problem that coders must face is complexity. Complexity is many times the actual result of wanting to simplify code readability, but often this is at the expense of functional and source simplicity.



      Complexity propagates throughout a project. In the example of your code the view name objects {name : "top"} means that at all levels of the project the need to access a view by name requires the additional object property reference "name". On a large project the seamingly simple use of a named property can add dozens or more lines of source code.



      Simplicity means looking further than just the immediate code, but how data structure, data sources, and access methods effect code complexity throughout the project.



      Sources of complexity




      1. Data duplication


      You have some data duplication.



      The array idArray is a duplication of the blueprints keys and can be computed using Object.keys(bluePrints) or better still use a for loop to extract both the id and value of each entry in bluePrint.





      1. Expression of the implied


      The view array has objects containing just one property {name : "bottom"}, ... which just adds complication. Why not just have an array of view names. This will make future manipulation easier.



      eg finding a view in array of string is



      const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.includes(viewName);


      As opposed to the more complicated search that requires an addition call stack item, associated context, and additional references.



      const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.some(view => view.name === viewName);



      1. Indirect references


      The property colorId is an indirect reference to an object in a, (I am guessing) map, mapLike, or array of colors.



      This means that each time you need to handle the print's color you need to include code that locates the color by Id. You can simplify by using a direct reference to the color, you thus don't need to lookup the color by Id each time you need it. Saving functional and source complexity.



      Example



      This makes some assumptions about your project and code and is only meant as an example. How your project is structured is unknown and will affect the quality of this example.



      An alternative blueprint filter as a function that has an argument pertaining to the filter criteria, removing view name object in favour of the simpler string, and directly referencing the colors.



      // arg views is array of strings ["top", "bottom"]
      const filterPrintsByViews = (prints, ...views) => {
      const result = ;
      for (const [id, value] of Object.entries(prints)) {
      if (views.every(name => value.views.some(view => view.name === name))) {
      result.push({colorRef: colors[id], views: value.views.map(view => view.name)});
      }
      }
      return result;
      }

      // Data sources ============================================
      // assuming that id and value are not uinque
      const colors = {
      "12": {color: "red"},
      "231":{color: "white"},
      "73": {color: "black"},
      "4": {color: "silver"},
      "20": {color: "silver"}, // second case of silver
      };

      const blueprints = {
      "12":{color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
      "231":{color: "blue", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
      "73":{color: "cyan", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
      "4":{color: "gold", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
      };


      // Usage =========================================================
      const result = filterPrintsByViews(bluePrints, "top", "bottom");


      // Example of resulting data
      // result looks like
      [
      {colorRef: {color: "red"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
      {colorRef: {color: "black"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
      {colorRef: {color: "silver"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
      ];





      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Keeping it simple



        One big problem that coders must face is complexity. Complexity is many times the actual result of wanting to simplify code readability, but often this is at the expense of functional and source simplicity.



        Complexity propagates throughout a project. In the example of your code the view name objects {name : "top"} means that at all levels of the project the need to access a view by name requires the additional object property reference "name". On a large project the seamingly simple use of a named property can add dozens or more lines of source code.



        Simplicity means looking further than just the immediate code, but how data structure, data sources, and access methods effect code complexity throughout the project.



        Sources of complexity




        1. Data duplication


        You have some data duplication.



        The array idArray is a duplication of the blueprints keys and can be computed using Object.keys(bluePrints) or better still use a for loop to extract both the id and value of each entry in bluePrint.





        1. Expression of the implied


        The view array has objects containing just one property {name : "bottom"}, ... which just adds complication. Why not just have an array of view names. This will make future manipulation easier.



        eg finding a view in array of string is



        const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.includes(viewName);


        As opposed to the more complicated search that requires an addition call stack item, associated context, and additional references.



        const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.some(view => view.name === viewName);



        1. Indirect references


        The property colorId is an indirect reference to an object in a, (I am guessing) map, mapLike, or array of colors.



        This means that each time you need to handle the print's color you need to include code that locates the color by Id. You can simplify by using a direct reference to the color, you thus don't need to lookup the color by Id each time you need it. Saving functional and source complexity.



        Example



        This makes some assumptions about your project and code and is only meant as an example. How your project is structured is unknown and will affect the quality of this example.



        An alternative blueprint filter as a function that has an argument pertaining to the filter criteria, removing view name object in favour of the simpler string, and directly referencing the colors.



        // arg views is array of strings ["top", "bottom"]
        const filterPrintsByViews = (prints, ...views) => {
        const result = ;
        for (const [id, value] of Object.entries(prints)) {
        if (views.every(name => value.views.some(view => view.name === name))) {
        result.push({colorRef: colors[id], views: value.views.map(view => view.name)});
        }
        }
        return result;
        }

        // Data sources ============================================
        // assuming that id and value are not uinque
        const colors = {
        "12": {color: "red"},
        "231":{color: "white"},
        "73": {color: "black"},
        "4": {color: "silver"},
        "20": {color: "silver"}, // second case of silver
        };

        const blueprints = {
        "12":{color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        "231":{color: "blue", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
        "73":{color: "cyan", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        "4":{color: "gold", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        };


        // Usage =========================================================
        const result = filterPrintsByViews(bluePrints, "top", "bottom");


        // Example of resulting data
        // result looks like
        [
        {colorRef: {color: "red"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        {colorRef: {color: "black"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        {colorRef: {color: "silver"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        ];





        share|improve this answer














        Keeping it simple



        One big problem that coders must face is complexity. Complexity is many times the actual result of wanting to simplify code readability, but often this is at the expense of functional and source simplicity.



        Complexity propagates throughout a project. In the example of your code the view name objects {name : "top"} means that at all levels of the project the need to access a view by name requires the additional object property reference "name". On a large project the seamingly simple use of a named property can add dozens or more lines of source code.



        Simplicity means looking further than just the immediate code, but how data structure, data sources, and access methods effect code complexity throughout the project.



        Sources of complexity




        1. Data duplication


        You have some data duplication.



        The array idArray is a duplication of the blueprints keys and can be computed using Object.keys(bluePrints) or better still use a for loop to extract both the id and value of each entry in bluePrint.





        1. Expression of the implied


        The view array has objects containing just one property {name : "bottom"}, ... which just adds complication. Why not just have an array of view names. This will make future manipulation easier.



        eg finding a view in array of string is



        const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.includes(viewName);


        As opposed to the more complicated search that requires an addition call stack item, associated context, and additional references.



        const printHasView = (print, viewName) => print.views.some(view => view.name === viewName);



        1. Indirect references


        The property colorId is an indirect reference to an object in a, (I am guessing) map, mapLike, or array of colors.



        This means that each time you need to handle the print's color you need to include code that locates the color by Id. You can simplify by using a direct reference to the color, you thus don't need to lookup the color by Id each time you need it. Saving functional and source complexity.



        Example



        This makes some assumptions about your project and code and is only meant as an example. How your project is structured is unknown and will affect the quality of this example.



        An alternative blueprint filter as a function that has an argument pertaining to the filter criteria, removing view name object in favour of the simpler string, and directly referencing the colors.



        // arg views is array of strings ["top", "bottom"]
        const filterPrintsByViews = (prints, ...views) => {
        const result = ;
        for (const [id, value] of Object.entries(prints)) {
        if (views.every(name => value.views.some(view => view.name === name))) {
        result.push({colorRef: colors[id], views: value.views.map(view => view.name)});
        }
        }
        return result;
        }

        // Data sources ============================================
        // assuming that id and value are not uinque
        const colors = {
        "12": {color: "red"},
        "231":{color: "white"},
        "73": {color: "black"},
        "4": {color: "silver"},
        "20": {color: "silver"}, // second case of silver
        };

        const blueprints = {
        "12":{color: "red", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        "231":{color: "blue", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}]},
        "73":{color: "cyan", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        "4":{color: "gold", views: [{name: "front"}, {name: "back"}, {name: "top"}, {name: "bottom"}]},
        };


        // Usage =========================================================
        const result = filterPrintsByViews(bluePrints, "top", "bottom");


        // Example of resulting data
        // result looks like
        [
        {colorRef: {color: "red"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        {colorRef: {color: "black"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        {colorRef: {color: "silver"}, views: ["front", "back", "top", "bottom"]},
        ];






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 16 at 13:28

























        answered Nov 16 at 12:46









        Blindman67

        6,5241521




        6,5241521






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207744%2fextracting-data-in-es6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

            Deduzione

            Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”