Super hard system of equations












27















Solve the system of equation for real numbers




begin{split}
(a+b) &(c+d) &= 1 & qquad (1)\
(a^2+b^2)&(c^2+d^2) &= 9 & qquad (2)\
(a^3+b^3)&(c^3+d^3) &= 7 & qquad (3)\
(a^4+b^4)&(c^4+d^4) &=25 & qquad (4)\
end{split}





First I used the identity
$$(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=(ac-bd)^2+(bc+ad)^2$$
Use this identity to (4) too
and simplify (3),
we obtain $$(a^2+b^2-ab)(c^2+d^2-cd)=7$$
And suppose $x=abcd$ use $ac=x /bd , bc=x/ad$
But got stuck...










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday
















27















Solve the system of equation for real numbers




begin{split}
(a+b) &(c+d) &= 1 & qquad (1)\
(a^2+b^2)&(c^2+d^2) &= 9 & qquad (2)\
(a^3+b^3)&(c^3+d^3) &= 7 & qquad (3)\
(a^4+b^4)&(c^4+d^4) &=25 & qquad (4)\
end{split}





First I used the identity
$$(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=(ac-bd)^2+(bc+ad)^2$$
Use this identity to (4) too
and simplify (3),
we obtain $$(a^2+b^2-ab)(c^2+d^2-cd)=7$$
And suppose $x=abcd$ use $ac=x /bd , bc=x/ad$
But got stuck...










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday














27












27








27


9






Solve the system of equation for real numbers




begin{split}
(a+b) &(c+d) &= 1 & qquad (1)\
(a^2+b^2)&(c^2+d^2) &= 9 & qquad (2)\
(a^3+b^3)&(c^3+d^3) &= 7 & qquad (3)\
(a^4+b^4)&(c^4+d^4) &=25 & qquad (4)\
end{split}





First I used the identity
$$(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=(ac-bd)^2+(bc+ad)^2$$
Use this identity to (4) too
and simplify (3),
we obtain $$(a^2+b^2-ab)(c^2+d^2-cd)=7$$
And suppose $x=abcd$ use $ac=x /bd , bc=x/ad$
But got stuck...










share|cite|improve this question
















Solve the system of equation for real numbers




begin{split}
(a+b) &(c+d) &= 1 & qquad (1)\
(a^2+b^2)&(c^2+d^2) &= 9 & qquad (2)\
(a^3+b^3)&(c^3+d^3) &= 7 & qquad (3)\
(a^4+b^4)&(c^4+d^4) &=25 & qquad (4)\
end{split}





First I used the identity
$$(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=(ac-bd)^2+(bc+ad)^2$$
Use this identity to (4) too
and simplify (3),
we obtain $$(a^2+b^2-ab)(c^2+d^2-cd)=7$$
And suppose $x=abcd$ use $ac=x /bd , bc=x/ad$
But got stuck...







algebra-precalculus systems-of-equations symmetric-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Harry Peter

5,46111439




5,46111439










asked 2 days ago









HeartHeart

18516




18516








  • 2




    I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday














  • 2




    I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday








2




2




I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
2 days ago




I would use that $$a^3+b^3=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)$$ etc
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
2 days ago




1




1




Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
– Jean Marie
yesterday




Your system is a very interesting (and puzzling!). Could you say where you found it ?
– Jean Marie
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















20














Hint: $ac=x, bc=y, ad=u, bd=v$, then the equations are



$x+y+u+v=1$



$x^2+y^2+u^2+v^2=9$



$x^3+y^3+u^3+v^3=7$



$x^4+y^4+u^4+v^4=25$



Use Newton-Girard to compute the elementary polynomials.
Then you have the polynomial $P(z)= (z-x)(z-y)(z-u)(z-v)$ with variable $z$.
Solve the quartic equation $P(z)=0$, and there you have the values $x,y,u,v$ in some order.
Note that not in any order: $xv=yu$ must be true, see the definition of these variables.



Of course, once you have $x,y,u,v$, it is easy to compute $a,b,c,d$.



P.S. By this way we can get:
$${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2},$$ which gives $abcd=-2.$
Up to symmetry, the solution is $(a,b,c,d)= (t, -sqrt{2}t, -frac{1}{t}, -frac{sqrt{2}}{t})$ for any $tneq 0$.
(By up to symmetry, I mean you can switch $a$ and $b$, you can switch $c$ and $d$, and you can switch the pair $(a,b)$ with $(c,d)$, so there are $8$ symmetries.)






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    I solved your system. What is the rest?
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago










  • I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    2 days ago












  • I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago





















5














Not really complete, but an interesting result using simple algebraic manipulations.





Write:
$$begin{align}
a^2+b^2&=(a+b)^2-2ab\
a^3+b^3&=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)((a+b)^2-3ab)\
a^4+b^4&=((a^2)^2+(b^2)^2)=cdots=(a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2\
vdots
end{align}$$

From $(2)$, we have:
$$begin{align}
(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)&=((a+b)^2-2ab)((c+d)^2-2cd)=9\
&=color{red}{(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}-2ab(c+d)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4abcd=9
end{align}$$

But from $(1)$, we know that $(a+b)(c+d)=1$, then the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ is also equal to $1$, so the result above becomes:
$$2abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=4tag{1*}$$
From $(3)$, we have:
$$begin{align}
(a^3+b^3)(c^3+d^3)&=color{red}{(a+b)}((a+b)^2-3ab)color{red}{(c+d)}((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
&=((a+b)^2-3ab)((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
&qquadvdots\
&=3abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=2tag{2*}
end{align}$$

Adding $(1*)$ and $(2*)$, we get $abcd=-2$ and that $color{pink}{ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2=-8}$.





Now $(4)$ is really tricky, but you can write it as:
$$begin{align}
left((a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2right)left((c+d)^4+2c^2d^2-4cd(c+d)^2right)&=25
end{align}$$

Expanding, and we can eliminate $(a+b)^4(c+d)^4$ since it is equal to $1$. Then we have:
$$begin{align}
a^2b^2(c+d)^4-2ab(c+d)^2+c^2d^2(a+b)^4+2(abcd)^2-4abc^2d^2(a+b)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4a^2b^2cd(c+d)^2-4abcd=12
end{align}$$

Using the fact that $abcd=-2$, then we can shorten the equation above into:
$$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}+5ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2+16=12tag{3*}$$
However, you can see that the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ looks very close to the square of two sums:
$$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}=(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2-2color{blue}{abcd(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}$$
However we already know the value of the part in $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ to be $-2
cdot 1$
.
Now we can write $(3*)$ as:
$$(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2+6ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2=-8$$





From here, you can substitute $x=ab(c+d)^2$ and $y=cd(a+b)^2$, which gives two systems of equation:
$$(x+y)^2+6x-10y=-8\
x+y=-8$$

This has one solution:
$$x=-frac{19}2,,y=frac32$$





You can try working from here.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday



















5














We are going to show that $(a,b)$ belongs to one of the two lines with equations $b=sqrt{a}$ and $b=frac{1}{sqrt{a}}$ as displayed on the following figure. It will give the answer, due to the symmetry of the system of equations with respect to the group of variables $(a,b)$ vs. $(c,d)$. Moreover, we will establish (see (*) at the bottom) that the last equation is superfluous.



enter image description here



Here is the explanation :



Let :



$$S_1:=a+b, S_2:=c+d, P_1:=ab, P_2:=cd$$



The system constituted by the first three equations can be written, with these variables, using classical transformations :



$$begin{cases}
(A) &S_1S_2&=&1& &\
(B) &(S_1^2-2P_1)(S_2^2-2P_2)&=&9 & implies & (C) 1-2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+4(P_1P_2)=9\
(D) &(S_1^3-2P_1S_1)(S_2^3-2P_2S_2)&=&7 & implies & (E) 1-3S_1S_2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+9(P_1P_2)=7.
end{cases}$$



(equations (C) and (E) are obtained by expansion of (B) and (D) resp., using relationship (A)).



Setting



$$alpha := P_1P_2 text{and} beta := P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2,$$



equations (C) and (E) become :



$$begin{cases}
(C) & 2alpha-beta&=&4\
(E) & 3alpha-beta&=&2
end{cases} implies alpha=-2 text{and} beta=-8.$$



Using the fact that $S_1S_2=1$ and $alpha=P_1P_2=-2$, equation $beta=-8$ becomes :



$$P_1 frac{1}{S_1^2} - frac{2}{P_1}S_1^2 = -8$$



i.e.,



$$(F) P_1^2 + 8 P_1S_1^2 - 2 S_1^4 =0,$$



which can be considered as a quadratic equation in variable $P_1$ giving two solutions. Due to classical condition



$$(a+b)^2 geq 2ab iff S_1^2 geq 2P_1,$$



only one of these solutions is eligible :



$$P_1=(-4+3sqrt{2})S_1^2 iff ab=(-4+3sqrt{2})(a+b)^2 iff (b-sqrt{2}a)(b-frac{sqrt{2}}{2}a)=0$$



whence the result corresponding to the figure.



The parametric equations of the two lines are



$$(a,b)=(p,p sqrt{2}) text{and} (a,b)=(p,p frac{sqrt{2}}{2}), text{for any} p neq 0$$



Due to the symmetry of equations, we have as well, for any $q neq 0$ :



$$(c,d)=(q,q sqrt{2}) text{and} (c,d)=(q,q frac{sqrt{2}}{2}).$$



A quick glance at any of the four equations show that necessarily $q=frac{1}{p}$. We find back in this way all the solutions given by @Claude Leibovici and @A. Pongrácz .





(*) In fact, the fourth equation is a consequence of the first three. Here is why :



First of all, relationship (F) is equivalent to :



$$(G) S_1^4=frac12P_1^2+4P_1S_1^2.$$



As the fourth equation can be written :



$$(H) (S_1^4+2P_1^2-4P_1S_1^2)(S_2^4+2P_2^2-4P_2S_2^2)=25,$$



using (G) in (H), we get :



$$frac52P_1^2 frac52P_2^2=25,$$



which is a tautology due to the fact that $alpha=P_1P_2=-2.$






share|cite|improve this answer































    4














    This is not an answer but it is too long for a comment.



    Looking at this system of equations, I had a very strange feeling (which I cannot explain).



    Using a CAS, I solved equations $(1)$, $(2)$, $(3)$ for $a,b,c$ as functions of $d$ and obtained $8$ solutions which are listed below
    $$left{a= frac{2}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c=
    -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c=
    -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{2}{d},b=
    -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
    -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
    -frac{1}{d},b= -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
    -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
    -frac{1}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
    frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright}$$



    The problem is that, replacing in $(4)$ any of these solutions the resulting equation is $25=25$ !






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 4




      It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago










    • @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
      – Claude Leibovici
      2 days ago










    • This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063839%2fsuper-hard-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    20














    Hint: $ac=x, bc=y, ad=u, bd=v$, then the equations are



    $x+y+u+v=1$



    $x^2+y^2+u^2+v^2=9$



    $x^3+y^3+u^3+v^3=7$



    $x^4+y^4+u^4+v^4=25$



    Use Newton-Girard to compute the elementary polynomials.
    Then you have the polynomial $P(z)= (z-x)(z-y)(z-u)(z-v)$ with variable $z$.
    Solve the quartic equation $P(z)=0$, and there you have the values $x,y,u,v$ in some order.
    Note that not in any order: $xv=yu$ must be true, see the definition of these variables.



    Of course, once you have $x,y,u,v$, it is easy to compute $a,b,c,d$.



    P.S. By this way we can get:
    $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2},$$ which gives $abcd=-2.$
    Up to symmetry, the solution is $(a,b,c,d)= (t, -sqrt{2}t, -frac{1}{t}, -frac{sqrt{2}}{t})$ for any $tneq 0$.
    (By up to symmetry, I mean you can switch $a$ and $b$, you can switch $c$ and $d$, and you can switch the pair $(a,b)$ with $(c,d)$, so there are $8$ symmetries.)






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 2




      I solved your system. What is the rest?
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago






    • 2




      Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago










    • I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago








    • 1




      @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
      – A. Pongrácz
      2 days ago












    • I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago


















    20














    Hint: $ac=x, bc=y, ad=u, bd=v$, then the equations are



    $x+y+u+v=1$



    $x^2+y^2+u^2+v^2=9$



    $x^3+y^3+u^3+v^3=7$



    $x^4+y^4+u^4+v^4=25$



    Use Newton-Girard to compute the elementary polynomials.
    Then you have the polynomial $P(z)= (z-x)(z-y)(z-u)(z-v)$ with variable $z$.
    Solve the quartic equation $P(z)=0$, and there you have the values $x,y,u,v$ in some order.
    Note that not in any order: $xv=yu$ must be true, see the definition of these variables.



    Of course, once you have $x,y,u,v$, it is easy to compute $a,b,c,d$.



    P.S. By this way we can get:
    $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2},$$ which gives $abcd=-2.$
    Up to symmetry, the solution is $(a,b,c,d)= (t, -sqrt{2}t, -frac{1}{t}, -frac{sqrt{2}}{t})$ for any $tneq 0$.
    (By up to symmetry, I mean you can switch $a$ and $b$, you can switch $c$ and $d$, and you can switch the pair $(a,b)$ with $(c,d)$, so there are $8$ symmetries.)






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 2




      I solved your system. What is the rest?
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago






    • 2




      Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago










    • I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago








    • 1




      @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
      – A. Pongrácz
      2 days ago












    • I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago
















    20












    20








    20






    Hint: $ac=x, bc=y, ad=u, bd=v$, then the equations are



    $x+y+u+v=1$



    $x^2+y^2+u^2+v^2=9$



    $x^3+y^3+u^3+v^3=7$



    $x^4+y^4+u^4+v^4=25$



    Use Newton-Girard to compute the elementary polynomials.
    Then you have the polynomial $P(z)= (z-x)(z-y)(z-u)(z-v)$ with variable $z$.
    Solve the quartic equation $P(z)=0$, and there you have the values $x,y,u,v$ in some order.
    Note that not in any order: $xv=yu$ must be true, see the definition of these variables.



    Of course, once you have $x,y,u,v$, it is easy to compute $a,b,c,d$.



    P.S. By this way we can get:
    $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2},$$ which gives $abcd=-2.$
    Up to symmetry, the solution is $(a,b,c,d)= (t, -sqrt{2}t, -frac{1}{t}, -frac{sqrt{2}}{t})$ for any $tneq 0$.
    (By up to symmetry, I mean you can switch $a$ and $b$, you can switch $c$ and $d$, and you can switch the pair $(a,b)$ with $(c,d)$, so there are $8$ symmetries.)






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Hint: $ac=x, bc=y, ad=u, bd=v$, then the equations are



    $x+y+u+v=1$



    $x^2+y^2+u^2+v^2=9$



    $x^3+y^3+u^3+v^3=7$



    $x^4+y^4+u^4+v^4=25$



    Use Newton-Girard to compute the elementary polynomials.
    Then you have the polynomial $P(z)= (z-x)(z-y)(z-u)(z-v)$ with variable $z$.
    Solve the quartic equation $P(z)=0$, and there you have the values $x,y,u,v$ in some order.
    Note that not in any order: $xv=yu$ must be true, see the definition of these variables.



    Of course, once you have $x,y,u,v$, it is easy to compute $a,b,c,d$.



    P.S. By this way we can get:
    $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2},$$ which gives $abcd=-2.$
    Up to symmetry, the solution is $(a,b,c,d)= (t, -sqrt{2}t, -frac{1}{t}, -frac{sqrt{2}}{t})$ for any $tneq 0$.
    (By up to symmetry, I mean you can switch $a$ and $b$, you can switch $c$ and $d$, and you can switch the pair $(a,b)$ with $(c,d)$, so there are $8$ symmetries.)







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    A. PongráczA. Pongrácz

    5,8881929




    5,8881929








    • 2




      I solved your system. What is the rest?
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago






    • 2




      Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago










    • I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago








    • 1




      @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
      – A. Pongrácz
      2 days ago












    • I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago
















    • 2




      I solved your system. What is the rest?
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago






    • 2




      Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
      – Michael Rozenberg
      2 days ago










    • I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago








    • 1




      @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
      – A. Pongrácz
      2 days ago












    • I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
      – Jean Marie
      2 days ago










    2




    2




    I solved your system. What is the rest?
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago




    I solved your system. What is the rest?
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago




    2




    2




    Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago




    Yes, I see now. We can kill it.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    2 days ago












    I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago






    I am sorry but I don't find your derivation very clear. Besides, a) the solution you propose doesn't work : from the four equations $(1) ac=-1=x, (2) bc=2=y, (3) ad=sqrt{2}=u, (4) bd=-sqrt{2}=v$, if I divide (1) by (3), I get $c/d=-1/sqrt{2}$, whereas, if I divide (2) by (3), I get $c/d=sqrt{2}$, which is contradictory. b) See the infinite family of solutions provided by Claude.
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago






    1




    1




    @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    2 days ago






    @JeanMarie I am sorry if you don't find it clear, but could you be more specific? I checked, and it seems to me that the solution (given by @MichaelRozenberg) is correct for $x,y,u,v$. From that it should be a routine taks to solve the original system of equations. You made a mistake though: as I said, you cannot randomly pick which root is which variable. It should be $ab=-1, cd=2, ac=sqrt{2}, bd=-sqrt{2}$, or one of the other seven symmetrical choices. Keep in mind that $xv=yu$.
    – A. Pongrácz
    2 days ago














    I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago






    I realize that I have misunderstood your set equality $${x,y,u,v}={-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2}$$ that I have interpreted as a t-uple equality $$(x,y,u,v)=(-1,2,sqrt2,-sqrt2)$$... But what I find not evident to understand is a) the (clever !) transformation of the initial system into yours b) what is exactly the set of solutions, being understood that it depends (at least) on an arbitrary constant : why/how that ?
    – Jean Marie
    2 days ago













    5














    Not really complete, but an interesting result using simple algebraic manipulations.





    Write:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2+b^2&=(a+b)^2-2ab\
    a^3+b^3&=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)((a+b)^2-3ab)\
    a^4+b^4&=((a^2)^2+(b^2)^2)=cdots=(a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2\
    vdots
    end{align}$$

    From $(2)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)&=((a+b)^2-2ab)((c+d)^2-2cd)=9\
    &=color{red}{(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}-2ab(c+d)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4abcd=9
    end{align}$$

    But from $(1)$, we know that $(a+b)(c+d)=1$, then the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ is also equal to $1$, so the result above becomes:
    $$2abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=4tag{1*}$$
    From $(3)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^3+b^3)(c^3+d^3)&=color{red}{(a+b)}((a+b)^2-3ab)color{red}{(c+d)}((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &=((a+b)^2-3ab)((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &qquadvdots\
    &=3abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=2tag{2*}
    end{align}$$

    Adding $(1*)$ and $(2*)$, we get $abcd=-2$ and that $color{pink}{ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2=-8}$.





    Now $(4)$ is really tricky, but you can write it as:
    $$begin{align}
    left((a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2right)left((c+d)^4+2c^2d^2-4cd(c+d)^2right)&=25
    end{align}$$

    Expanding, and we can eliminate $(a+b)^4(c+d)^4$ since it is equal to $1$. Then we have:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2b^2(c+d)^4-2ab(c+d)^2+c^2d^2(a+b)^4+2(abcd)^2-4abc^2d^2(a+b)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4a^2b^2cd(c+d)^2-4abcd=12
    end{align}$$

    Using the fact that $abcd=-2$, then we can shorten the equation above into:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}+5ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2+16=12tag{3*}$$
    However, you can see that the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ looks very close to the square of two sums:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}=(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2-2color{blue}{abcd(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}$$
    However we already know the value of the part in $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ to be $-2
    cdot 1$
    .
    Now we can write $(3*)$ as:
    $$(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2+6ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2=-8$$





    From here, you can substitute $x=ab(c+d)^2$ and $y=cd(a+b)^2$, which gives two systems of equation:
    $$(x+y)^2+6x-10y=-8\
    x+y=-8$$

    This has one solution:
    $$x=-frac{19}2,,y=frac32$$





    You can try working from here.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
      – Jean Marie
      yesterday
















    5














    Not really complete, but an interesting result using simple algebraic manipulations.





    Write:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2+b^2&=(a+b)^2-2ab\
    a^3+b^3&=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)((a+b)^2-3ab)\
    a^4+b^4&=((a^2)^2+(b^2)^2)=cdots=(a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2\
    vdots
    end{align}$$

    From $(2)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)&=((a+b)^2-2ab)((c+d)^2-2cd)=9\
    &=color{red}{(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}-2ab(c+d)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4abcd=9
    end{align}$$

    But from $(1)$, we know that $(a+b)(c+d)=1$, then the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ is also equal to $1$, so the result above becomes:
    $$2abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=4tag{1*}$$
    From $(3)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^3+b^3)(c^3+d^3)&=color{red}{(a+b)}((a+b)^2-3ab)color{red}{(c+d)}((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &=((a+b)^2-3ab)((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &qquadvdots\
    &=3abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=2tag{2*}
    end{align}$$

    Adding $(1*)$ and $(2*)$, we get $abcd=-2$ and that $color{pink}{ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2=-8}$.





    Now $(4)$ is really tricky, but you can write it as:
    $$begin{align}
    left((a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2right)left((c+d)^4+2c^2d^2-4cd(c+d)^2right)&=25
    end{align}$$

    Expanding, and we can eliminate $(a+b)^4(c+d)^4$ since it is equal to $1$. Then we have:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2b^2(c+d)^4-2ab(c+d)^2+c^2d^2(a+b)^4+2(abcd)^2-4abc^2d^2(a+b)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4a^2b^2cd(c+d)^2-4abcd=12
    end{align}$$

    Using the fact that $abcd=-2$, then we can shorten the equation above into:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}+5ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2+16=12tag{3*}$$
    However, you can see that the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ looks very close to the square of two sums:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}=(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2-2color{blue}{abcd(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}$$
    However we already know the value of the part in $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ to be $-2
    cdot 1$
    .
    Now we can write $(3*)$ as:
    $$(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2+6ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2=-8$$





    From here, you can substitute $x=ab(c+d)^2$ and $y=cd(a+b)^2$, which gives two systems of equation:
    $$(x+y)^2+6x-10y=-8\
    x+y=-8$$

    This has one solution:
    $$x=-frac{19}2,,y=frac32$$





    You can try working from here.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
      – Jean Marie
      yesterday














    5












    5








    5






    Not really complete, but an interesting result using simple algebraic manipulations.





    Write:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2+b^2&=(a+b)^2-2ab\
    a^3+b^3&=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)((a+b)^2-3ab)\
    a^4+b^4&=((a^2)^2+(b^2)^2)=cdots=(a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2\
    vdots
    end{align}$$

    From $(2)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)&=((a+b)^2-2ab)((c+d)^2-2cd)=9\
    &=color{red}{(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}-2ab(c+d)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4abcd=9
    end{align}$$

    But from $(1)$, we know that $(a+b)(c+d)=1$, then the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ is also equal to $1$, so the result above becomes:
    $$2abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=4tag{1*}$$
    From $(3)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^3+b^3)(c^3+d^3)&=color{red}{(a+b)}((a+b)^2-3ab)color{red}{(c+d)}((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &=((a+b)^2-3ab)((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &qquadvdots\
    &=3abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=2tag{2*}
    end{align}$$

    Adding $(1*)$ and $(2*)$, we get $abcd=-2$ and that $color{pink}{ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2=-8}$.





    Now $(4)$ is really tricky, but you can write it as:
    $$begin{align}
    left((a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2right)left((c+d)^4+2c^2d^2-4cd(c+d)^2right)&=25
    end{align}$$

    Expanding, and we can eliminate $(a+b)^4(c+d)^4$ since it is equal to $1$. Then we have:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2b^2(c+d)^4-2ab(c+d)^2+c^2d^2(a+b)^4+2(abcd)^2-4abc^2d^2(a+b)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4a^2b^2cd(c+d)^2-4abcd=12
    end{align}$$

    Using the fact that $abcd=-2$, then we can shorten the equation above into:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}+5ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2+16=12tag{3*}$$
    However, you can see that the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ looks very close to the square of two sums:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}=(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2-2color{blue}{abcd(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}$$
    However we already know the value of the part in $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ to be $-2
    cdot 1$
    .
    Now we can write $(3*)$ as:
    $$(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2+6ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2=-8$$





    From here, you can substitute $x=ab(c+d)^2$ and $y=cd(a+b)^2$, which gives two systems of equation:
    $$(x+y)^2+6x-10y=-8\
    x+y=-8$$

    This has one solution:
    $$x=-frac{19}2,,y=frac32$$





    You can try working from here.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Not really complete, but an interesting result using simple algebraic manipulations.





    Write:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2+b^2&=(a+b)^2-2ab\
    a^3+b^3&=(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab)=(a+b)((a+b)^2-3ab)\
    a^4+b^4&=((a^2)^2+(b^2)^2)=cdots=(a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2\
    vdots
    end{align}$$

    From $(2)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)&=((a+b)^2-2ab)((c+d)^2-2cd)=9\
    &=color{red}{(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}-2ab(c+d)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4abcd=9
    end{align}$$

    But from $(1)$, we know that $(a+b)(c+d)=1$, then the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ is also equal to $1$, so the result above becomes:
    $$2abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=4tag{1*}$$
    From $(3)$, we have:
    $$begin{align}
    (a^3+b^3)(c^3+d^3)&=color{red}{(a+b)}((a+b)^2-3ab)color{red}{(c+d)}((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &=((a+b)^2-3ab)((c+d)^2-3cd)=7\
    &qquadvdots\
    &=3abcd-ab(c+d)^2-cd(a+b)^2=2tag{2*}
    end{align}$$

    Adding $(1*)$ and $(2*)$, we get $abcd=-2$ and that $color{pink}{ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2=-8}$.





    Now $(4)$ is really tricky, but you can write it as:
    $$begin{align}
    left((a+b)^4+2a^2b^2-4ab(a+b)^2right)left((c+d)^4+2c^2d^2-4cd(c+d)^2right)&=25
    end{align}$$

    Expanding, and we can eliminate $(a+b)^4(c+d)^4$ since it is equal to $1$. Then we have:
    $$begin{align}
    a^2b^2(c+d)^4-2ab(c+d)^2+c^2d^2(a+b)^4+2(abcd)^2-4abc^2d^2(a+b)^2-2cd(a+b)^2-4a^2b^2cd(c+d)^2-4abcd=12
    end{align}$$

    Using the fact that $abcd=-2$, then we can shorten the equation above into:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}+5ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2+16=12tag{3*}$$
    However, you can see that the text in $color{red}{text{red}}$ looks very close to the square of two sums:
    $$color{red}{a^2b^2(c+d)^4+c^2d^2(a+b)^4}=(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2-2color{blue}{abcd(a+b)^2(c+d)^2}$$
    However we already know the value of the part in $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ to be $-2
    cdot 1$
    .
    Now we can write $(3*)$ as:
    $$(ab(c+d)^2+cd(a+b)^2)^2+6ab(c+d)^2-10cd(a+b)^2=-8$$





    From here, you can substitute $x=ab(c+d)^2$ and $y=cd(a+b)^2$, which gives two systems of equation:
    $$(x+y)^2+6x-10y=-8\
    x+y=-8$$

    This has one solution:
    $$x=-frac{19}2,,y=frac32$$





    You can try working from here.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    John GlennJohn Glenn

    1,957424




    1,957424












    • You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
      – Jean Marie
      yesterday


















    • You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
      – Jean Marie
      yesterday
















    You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday




    You and I have been working on the same tracks : obtaining values for expressions involving $a+b$ and $ab$ (such as my $alpha$ and $beta$) that provide equations. Afterwards, I would say that it's a matter of luck to find the right equations...
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday











    5














    We are going to show that $(a,b)$ belongs to one of the two lines with equations $b=sqrt{a}$ and $b=frac{1}{sqrt{a}}$ as displayed on the following figure. It will give the answer, due to the symmetry of the system of equations with respect to the group of variables $(a,b)$ vs. $(c,d)$. Moreover, we will establish (see (*) at the bottom) that the last equation is superfluous.



    enter image description here



    Here is the explanation :



    Let :



    $$S_1:=a+b, S_2:=c+d, P_1:=ab, P_2:=cd$$



    The system constituted by the first three equations can be written, with these variables, using classical transformations :



    $$begin{cases}
    (A) &S_1S_2&=&1& &\
    (B) &(S_1^2-2P_1)(S_2^2-2P_2)&=&9 & implies & (C) 1-2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+4(P_1P_2)=9\
    (D) &(S_1^3-2P_1S_1)(S_2^3-2P_2S_2)&=&7 & implies & (E) 1-3S_1S_2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+9(P_1P_2)=7.
    end{cases}$$



    (equations (C) and (E) are obtained by expansion of (B) and (D) resp., using relationship (A)).



    Setting



    $$alpha := P_1P_2 text{and} beta := P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2,$$



    equations (C) and (E) become :



    $$begin{cases}
    (C) & 2alpha-beta&=&4\
    (E) & 3alpha-beta&=&2
    end{cases} implies alpha=-2 text{and} beta=-8.$$



    Using the fact that $S_1S_2=1$ and $alpha=P_1P_2=-2$, equation $beta=-8$ becomes :



    $$P_1 frac{1}{S_1^2} - frac{2}{P_1}S_1^2 = -8$$



    i.e.,



    $$(F) P_1^2 + 8 P_1S_1^2 - 2 S_1^4 =0,$$



    which can be considered as a quadratic equation in variable $P_1$ giving two solutions. Due to classical condition



    $$(a+b)^2 geq 2ab iff S_1^2 geq 2P_1,$$



    only one of these solutions is eligible :



    $$P_1=(-4+3sqrt{2})S_1^2 iff ab=(-4+3sqrt{2})(a+b)^2 iff (b-sqrt{2}a)(b-frac{sqrt{2}}{2}a)=0$$



    whence the result corresponding to the figure.



    The parametric equations of the two lines are



    $$(a,b)=(p,p sqrt{2}) text{and} (a,b)=(p,p frac{sqrt{2}}{2}), text{for any} p neq 0$$



    Due to the symmetry of equations, we have as well, for any $q neq 0$ :



    $$(c,d)=(q,q sqrt{2}) text{and} (c,d)=(q,q frac{sqrt{2}}{2}).$$



    A quick glance at any of the four equations show that necessarily $q=frac{1}{p}$. We find back in this way all the solutions given by @Claude Leibovici and @A. Pongrácz .





    (*) In fact, the fourth equation is a consequence of the first three. Here is why :



    First of all, relationship (F) is equivalent to :



    $$(G) S_1^4=frac12P_1^2+4P_1S_1^2.$$



    As the fourth equation can be written :



    $$(H) (S_1^4+2P_1^2-4P_1S_1^2)(S_2^4+2P_2^2-4P_2S_2^2)=25,$$



    using (G) in (H), we get :



    $$frac52P_1^2 frac52P_2^2=25,$$



    which is a tautology due to the fact that $alpha=P_1P_2=-2.$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      5














      We are going to show that $(a,b)$ belongs to one of the two lines with equations $b=sqrt{a}$ and $b=frac{1}{sqrt{a}}$ as displayed on the following figure. It will give the answer, due to the symmetry of the system of equations with respect to the group of variables $(a,b)$ vs. $(c,d)$. Moreover, we will establish (see (*) at the bottom) that the last equation is superfluous.



      enter image description here



      Here is the explanation :



      Let :



      $$S_1:=a+b, S_2:=c+d, P_1:=ab, P_2:=cd$$



      The system constituted by the first three equations can be written, with these variables, using classical transformations :



      $$begin{cases}
      (A) &S_1S_2&=&1& &\
      (B) &(S_1^2-2P_1)(S_2^2-2P_2)&=&9 & implies & (C) 1-2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+4(P_1P_2)=9\
      (D) &(S_1^3-2P_1S_1)(S_2^3-2P_2S_2)&=&7 & implies & (E) 1-3S_1S_2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+9(P_1P_2)=7.
      end{cases}$$



      (equations (C) and (E) are obtained by expansion of (B) and (D) resp., using relationship (A)).



      Setting



      $$alpha := P_1P_2 text{and} beta := P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2,$$



      equations (C) and (E) become :



      $$begin{cases}
      (C) & 2alpha-beta&=&4\
      (E) & 3alpha-beta&=&2
      end{cases} implies alpha=-2 text{and} beta=-8.$$



      Using the fact that $S_1S_2=1$ and $alpha=P_1P_2=-2$, equation $beta=-8$ becomes :



      $$P_1 frac{1}{S_1^2} - frac{2}{P_1}S_1^2 = -8$$



      i.e.,



      $$(F) P_1^2 + 8 P_1S_1^2 - 2 S_1^4 =0,$$



      which can be considered as a quadratic equation in variable $P_1$ giving two solutions. Due to classical condition



      $$(a+b)^2 geq 2ab iff S_1^2 geq 2P_1,$$



      only one of these solutions is eligible :



      $$P_1=(-4+3sqrt{2})S_1^2 iff ab=(-4+3sqrt{2})(a+b)^2 iff (b-sqrt{2}a)(b-frac{sqrt{2}}{2}a)=0$$



      whence the result corresponding to the figure.



      The parametric equations of the two lines are



      $$(a,b)=(p,p sqrt{2}) text{and} (a,b)=(p,p frac{sqrt{2}}{2}), text{for any} p neq 0$$



      Due to the symmetry of equations, we have as well, for any $q neq 0$ :



      $$(c,d)=(q,q sqrt{2}) text{and} (c,d)=(q,q frac{sqrt{2}}{2}).$$



      A quick glance at any of the four equations show that necessarily $q=frac{1}{p}$. We find back in this way all the solutions given by @Claude Leibovici and @A. Pongrácz .





      (*) In fact, the fourth equation is a consequence of the first three. Here is why :



      First of all, relationship (F) is equivalent to :



      $$(G) S_1^4=frac12P_1^2+4P_1S_1^2.$$



      As the fourth equation can be written :



      $$(H) (S_1^4+2P_1^2-4P_1S_1^2)(S_2^4+2P_2^2-4P_2S_2^2)=25,$$



      using (G) in (H), we get :



      $$frac52P_1^2 frac52P_2^2=25,$$



      which is a tautology due to the fact that $alpha=P_1P_2=-2.$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5






        We are going to show that $(a,b)$ belongs to one of the two lines with equations $b=sqrt{a}$ and $b=frac{1}{sqrt{a}}$ as displayed on the following figure. It will give the answer, due to the symmetry of the system of equations with respect to the group of variables $(a,b)$ vs. $(c,d)$. Moreover, we will establish (see (*) at the bottom) that the last equation is superfluous.



        enter image description here



        Here is the explanation :



        Let :



        $$S_1:=a+b, S_2:=c+d, P_1:=ab, P_2:=cd$$



        The system constituted by the first three equations can be written, with these variables, using classical transformations :



        $$begin{cases}
        (A) &S_1S_2&=&1& &\
        (B) &(S_1^2-2P_1)(S_2^2-2P_2)&=&9 & implies & (C) 1-2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+4(P_1P_2)=9\
        (D) &(S_1^3-2P_1S_1)(S_2^3-2P_2S_2)&=&7 & implies & (E) 1-3S_1S_2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+9(P_1P_2)=7.
        end{cases}$$



        (equations (C) and (E) are obtained by expansion of (B) and (D) resp., using relationship (A)).



        Setting



        $$alpha := P_1P_2 text{and} beta := P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2,$$



        equations (C) and (E) become :



        $$begin{cases}
        (C) & 2alpha-beta&=&4\
        (E) & 3alpha-beta&=&2
        end{cases} implies alpha=-2 text{and} beta=-8.$$



        Using the fact that $S_1S_2=1$ and $alpha=P_1P_2=-2$, equation $beta=-8$ becomes :



        $$P_1 frac{1}{S_1^2} - frac{2}{P_1}S_1^2 = -8$$



        i.e.,



        $$(F) P_1^2 + 8 P_1S_1^2 - 2 S_1^4 =0,$$



        which can be considered as a quadratic equation in variable $P_1$ giving two solutions. Due to classical condition



        $$(a+b)^2 geq 2ab iff S_1^2 geq 2P_1,$$



        only one of these solutions is eligible :



        $$P_1=(-4+3sqrt{2})S_1^2 iff ab=(-4+3sqrt{2})(a+b)^2 iff (b-sqrt{2}a)(b-frac{sqrt{2}}{2}a)=0$$



        whence the result corresponding to the figure.



        The parametric equations of the two lines are



        $$(a,b)=(p,p sqrt{2}) text{and} (a,b)=(p,p frac{sqrt{2}}{2}), text{for any} p neq 0$$



        Due to the symmetry of equations, we have as well, for any $q neq 0$ :



        $$(c,d)=(q,q sqrt{2}) text{and} (c,d)=(q,q frac{sqrt{2}}{2}).$$



        A quick glance at any of the four equations show that necessarily $q=frac{1}{p}$. We find back in this way all the solutions given by @Claude Leibovici and @A. Pongrácz .





        (*) In fact, the fourth equation is a consequence of the first three. Here is why :



        First of all, relationship (F) is equivalent to :



        $$(G) S_1^4=frac12P_1^2+4P_1S_1^2.$$



        As the fourth equation can be written :



        $$(H) (S_1^4+2P_1^2-4P_1S_1^2)(S_2^4+2P_2^2-4P_2S_2^2)=25,$$



        using (G) in (H), we get :



        $$frac52P_1^2 frac52P_2^2=25,$$



        which is a tautology due to the fact that $alpha=P_1P_2=-2.$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        We are going to show that $(a,b)$ belongs to one of the two lines with equations $b=sqrt{a}$ and $b=frac{1}{sqrt{a}}$ as displayed on the following figure. It will give the answer, due to the symmetry of the system of equations with respect to the group of variables $(a,b)$ vs. $(c,d)$. Moreover, we will establish (see (*) at the bottom) that the last equation is superfluous.



        enter image description here



        Here is the explanation :



        Let :



        $$S_1:=a+b, S_2:=c+d, P_1:=ab, P_2:=cd$$



        The system constituted by the first three equations can be written, with these variables, using classical transformations :



        $$begin{cases}
        (A) &S_1S_2&=&1& &\
        (B) &(S_1^2-2P_1)(S_2^2-2P_2)&=&9 & implies & (C) 1-2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+4(P_1P_2)=9\
        (D) &(S_1^3-2P_1S_1)(S_2^3-2P_2S_2)&=&7 & implies & (E) 1-3S_1S_2(P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2)+9(P_1P_2)=7.
        end{cases}$$



        (equations (C) and (E) are obtained by expansion of (B) and (D) resp., using relationship (A)).



        Setting



        $$alpha := P_1P_2 text{and} beta := P_1S_2^2+P_2S_1^2,$$



        equations (C) and (E) become :



        $$begin{cases}
        (C) & 2alpha-beta&=&4\
        (E) & 3alpha-beta&=&2
        end{cases} implies alpha=-2 text{and} beta=-8.$$



        Using the fact that $S_1S_2=1$ and $alpha=P_1P_2=-2$, equation $beta=-8$ becomes :



        $$P_1 frac{1}{S_1^2} - frac{2}{P_1}S_1^2 = -8$$



        i.e.,



        $$(F) P_1^2 + 8 P_1S_1^2 - 2 S_1^4 =0,$$



        which can be considered as a quadratic equation in variable $P_1$ giving two solutions. Due to classical condition



        $$(a+b)^2 geq 2ab iff S_1^2 geq 2P_1,$$



        only one of these solutions is eligible :



        $$P_1=(-4+3sqrt{2})S_1^2 iff ab=(-4+3sqrt{2})(a+b)^2 iff (b-sqrt{2}a)(b-frac{sqrt{2}}{2}a)=0$$



        whence the result corresponding to the figure.



        The parametric equations of the two lines are



        $$(a,b)=(p,p sqrt{2}) text{and} (a,b)=(p,p frac{sqrt{2}}{2}), text{for any} p neq 0$$



        Due to the symmetry of equations, we have as well, for any $q neq 0$ :



        $$(c,d)=(q,q sqrt{2}) text{and} (c,d)=(q,q frac{sqrt{2}}{2}).$$



        A quick glance at any of the four equations show that necessarily $q=frac{1}{p}$. We find back in this way all the solutions given by @Claude Leibovici and @A. Pongrácz .





        (*) In fact, the fourth equation is a consequence of the first three. Here is why :



        First of all, relationship (F) is equivalent to :



        $$(G) S_1^4=frac12P_1^2+4P_1S_1^2.$$



        As the fourth equation can be written :



        $$(H) (S_1^4+2P_1^2-4P_1S_1^2)(S_2^4+2P_2^2-4P_2S_2^2)=25,$$



        using (G) in (H), we get :



        $$frac52P_1^2 frac52P_2^2=25,$$



        which is a tautology due to the fact that $alpha=P_1P_2=-2.$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered 2 days ago









        Jean MarieJean Marie

        28.9k41949




        28.9k41949























            4














            This is not an answer but it is too long for a comment.



            Looking at this system of equations, I had a very strange feeling (which I cannot explain).



            Using a CAS, I solved equations $(1)$, $(2)$, $(3)$ for $a,b,c$ as functions of $d$ and obtained $8$ solutions which are listed below
            $$left{a= frac{2}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{2}{d},b=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright}$$



            The problem is that, replacing in $(4)$ any of these solutions the resulting equation is $25=25$ !






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 4




              It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago










            • @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
              – Claude Leibovici
              2 days ago










            • This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago
















            4














            This is not an answer but it is too long for a comment.



            Looking at this system of equations, I had a very strange feeling (which I cannot explain).



            Using a CAS, I solved equations $(1)$, $(2)$, $(3)$ for $a,b,c$ as functions of $d$ and obtained $8$ solutions which are listed below
            $$left{a= frac{2}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{2}{d},b=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright}$$



            The problem is that, replacing in $(4)$ any of these solutions the resulting equation is $25=25$ !






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 4




              It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago










            • @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
              – Claude Leibovici
              2 days ago










            • This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago














            4












            4








            4






            This is not an answer but it is too long for a comment.



            Looking at this system of equations, I had a very strange feeling (which I cannot explain).



            Using a CAS, I solved equations $(1)$, $(2)$, $(3)$ for $a,b,c$ as functions of $d$ and obtained $8$ solutions which are listed below
            $$left{a= frac{2}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{2}{d},b=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright}$$



            The problem is that, replacing in $(4)$ any of these solutions the resulting equation is $25=25$ !






            share|cite|improve this answer












            This is not an answer but it is too long for a comment.



            Looking at this system of equations, I had a very strange feeling (which I cannot explain).



            Using a CAS, I solved equations $(1)$, $(2)$, $(3)$ for $a,b,c$ as functions of $d$ and obtained $8$ solutions which are listed below
            $$left{a= frac{2}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c=
            -frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a= frac{2}{d},b=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= frac{2}{d},c= frac{d}{sqrt{2}}right},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= -sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            -frac{1}{d},b= frac{sqrt{2}}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright},left{a=
            frac{sqrt{2}}{d},b= -frac{1}{d},c= sqrt{2} dright}$$



            The problem is that, replacing in $(4)$ any of these solutions the resulting equation is $25=25$ !







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

            119k1157132




            119k1157132








            • 4




              It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago










            • @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
              – Claude Leibovici
              2 days ago










            • This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago














            • 4




              It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago










            • @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
              – Claude Leibovici
              2 days ago










            • This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
              – Jean Marie
              2 days ago








            4




            4




            It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
            – Jean Marie
            2 days ago




            It is not a problem, Claude: you are perfectly right : if $(a,b,c,d)$ is a solution, $(a/k, b/k , ck, dk)$ is clearly a solution as well... Besides, bonne année 2019 !
            – Jean Marie
            2 days ago












            @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
            – Claude Leibovici
            2 days ago




            @JeanMarie. Good to see you here ! All my best wishes. Thanks for the comment.
            – Claude Leibovici
            2 days ago












            This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
            – Jean Marie
            2 days ago




            This issue is puzzling : the fact that we have an infinite set of solutions means a kind of (algebraic) dependency of this set of equations. But, how to find it, and, in the case such a dependency is found, how can we exploit it ?
            – Jean Marie
            2 days ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063839%2fsuper-hard-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Список кардиналов, возведённых папой римским Каликстом III

            Deduzione

            Mysql.sock missing - “Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket”